Keywords
Antagonist
Symbolic Violance
Language and Domination
Better Days《少年的你》
How to Cite
Abstract
When language is used in communication events, there also as an ideological distiction and a desire to dominate each other among its users. Because language is never separated from ideological motives, including domination motives. Domination occurs due to the existence of a strong group as the dominating party and a weak group as the dominated party with language as an instrument to achieve it. Symbolic violence marked by language forms that represent language crimes is a realization of the practice of domination. Through symbolic violence, the dominant party imposes its ideological influence on the dominant group. The practice of domination through symbolic violence can be found in the dialogue text of the antagonist in the film Better Days《少年的你》by Derek Tsang which is used as a data source. The patterned language forms used by the antagonist to attack the main character are used as data. After the data is identified and classified, it is analyzed through a qualitative approach using the concept of Bourdieu's theory of symbolic violence. The results of the analysis are presented through a descriptive method to obtain a detailed and concrete picture of the practice of domination of antagonist characters through symbolic violence. The results of the analysis show that symbolic violence, which represents the practice of domination, is realized through forms of language that have functioned as the language of punishment, the language of intimidation, the language of prohibition, the language of accusation, the language of insults, and language of command. Cultural capital (attitudes and lifestyles) is the most dominant capital that represents the attitudes and behavior of antagonists to produce and reproduce texts to legitimize their domination. Based on the frequency of occurrence, forbidden language is the most productive form of language, and accusation language is the language form with the least frequency of occurrence.
References
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1994. Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Busro, Muhammad. 2013. Bahada san Kekuasaan. Dapat diakses pada (https://muhbusro.wordpress.com/2013/01/30/bahasa-dan-kekuasaan/). (Diakses pada tanggal 21 April 2022).
Caloguori, Caludio. “Symbolic Violence and the Violation of Human Rights: Coninuing the Sociological Critique of Domination”. International Journal of Cryminology and Sociological Theory. Vol. 3, No. 2, Juni 2010. Pp. 388-400.
Eriyanto. 2002. Analisis Framing. Yogyakarta: PT. LKIS Yogyakarta.
Fashri, Fauzi. 2007. Penyingkapan Kuasa Simbol: Apropriasi Refleksi Pemikiran. Pierre Bourdieu. Yogyakarta: Juxtapose.
Fatmawatti, Nur Ika. 2020. Pierre Bourdieu dan Konsep Dasar Kekerasn Simbolik. Dalam MADANI Jurnal Politik dan Kemasyarakatan. Vol. 12, No. 1. 2020. Pp. 41-60. Dapat diakses pada https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/327233816.pdf (diakses pada tanggal 27 April 2022).
Foucault, Michel. 1971. Kritik Wacana Bahasa. Terjemahan Inyiak Ridwan Muzir. 2003. Yogyakarta: IRCiSoD.
Gramsci, Antonio. 2013. Prison Note Books -Catatan-Catatan Dari Penjara- (Dialih bahasakan: Teguh Wahyu Utomo). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Halid, Riska. 2021. Tindak Tutur Pelaku Pencemaran Nama Baik di Media Sosial Kajian Linguistik Forensik (Online) https://digilibadmin.unismuh.ac.id/upload/18672-Full_Text.pdf (diakses pada 7 November 2021).
Harahap, Sofyan Syafri. 2013. Analisis Kritis Atas Laporan Keuangan. Cetakan Kesebelas. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Haryatmoko. 2003. Menyingkap Kepalsuan Budaya Penguasa. Majalah BASIS. Nomor 11- 12 Tahun Ke-52. November-Desember. 2003.
Haryatmoko. 2007. Etika Komunikasi: Manipulasi Media, Kekerasan dan Pornografi. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Haryatmoko. 2010. Habitus dan Kapital Dalam Strategi Kekuasaan. In Seminar Paska-Sarjana Jurusan Sosiologi Universitas Indonesia pada tanggal 26 Agustus 2010. Jakarta.
Herliana, Monika; Suryadi, M.. 2019. Tindak Tutur Ilokusi Pengajar pada Proses Pembelajaran Bahasa Mandarin. Jurnal Lingua Idea, [S.l.], vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 89-105 (Online) https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jli.2019.10.2.2124 (diakses pada 7 November 2021).
Hughes, R. L., Ginnet, R. C., dan Curphy, G. J. 2009. Leadership: Enhancing the Lessons of Experience, 6th Edition. McGraw-Hill International Edition, Singapore.
Karman. 2017. BAHASA DAN KEKUASAAN (Instrumen Simbolik Peraih Kekuasaan Versi Bourdieu). Dalam Jurnal Studi Komunikasi dan Media. Vol. 21, No. 2 Juli- Desember 2017. Pp. 235-246.
Kuntarto, Niknik M. 2021. Selisik Linguistik Forensik Penanganan Konflik Komunikasi. Jakarta: PT. Elex Media Komputindo.
Littlejohn, W. S. (2002). Theories of Human Communication (7th ed.). Belmont-California: Wadsworth Group.
Littlejohn, W. S., & Foss, K. A. (2005). Theories of Human Communication (8th ed.). Belomont- California: Wadsworth Group.
Lubis, A. Hamid Hasan. 2015. Analisis Wacana Pragmatik. Bandung: Penerbit Angkasa.
Martono, Nanang. 2012. Kekerasan Simbolik di Sekolah Sebuah Ide Sosiologi Pendidikan Pierre Bourdieu. Depok: PT Rajagrafindo Persada.
Muthia, Ratna. Suhandano. 2015. Tuturan Penghinaan dan Pencemaran Nama Baik dalam Bahasa Indonesia. (Tesis tidak diterbitkan). Uniersitas Gajah Mada.
Ningtyas, Eka. 2015. Pierre Bourdieu, Language and Symbolic Power. Jurnal Poetika Vol. III No. 2, Desember 2015. Edisi online. https://www.academia.edu/36635603/PIERRE_BOURDIEU_LANGUAGE_AND_SYMBOLIC_POWER_pdf (Diunduh pada 5 Maret 2022).
Ritzer & Goodman. 2012. Teori Sosiologi Klasik – Post Modern Edisi Terbaru (Trans: Nurhadi). Yogyakarta: Kreasi Wacana.
Roekhan. 2012. Kekerasan Simbolik di Media Massa. (Online) dapat diakses pada https://sastra.um.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/11-Roekhan.pdf (diakses pada tanggal 27 April 2022).
Rusdiarti, Suma Riella. 2003. Bahasa, Pertarungan Simbolik, dan Kekuasaan. Basis VII(11—12):31—40.
Santoso, Anang. 2010. Bahasa Sebagai Media Kekuasaan: Menggugat Kekerasan Simbolik Dalam Wacana Publik. Dapat diakses pada http://studibahasakritis.blogspot.com/2010/05/bahasa-sebagai-media-kekuasaan_08.html. (Diakses pada tanggal 16 April 2022).
Simon, Roger. 2004. Gramsci Political Thought (Gagasan-Gagasan Politik Gramsci). Yogyakarta: INSIST dan Pustaka Pelajar.
Subandi, Subandi; Mustofa, A. 2019. Ideological and Hegemonic Implicatures of Japanese Male Registers Used by Japanese Young Women Speakers: Gender Based Analysis and Its Implication in Pedagogical Domain. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 227, 93–97. Dapat diakses pada https://dx.doi.org/10.2991/steach-18.2019.21. (Diakses pada tanggal 12 Mei 2022).
Subandi, Subandi; Pangesty, Herina Endah; Wibisono, Galih. 2020. Illocutionary Acts in Lost in Thailand Detective Humor Movie. Pp. 738-746. Atlantis-press. Dapat diakses pada https://dx.doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201201.124. (Diakses pada tanggal 10 Mei 2022).
Subandi, Subandi; Nurhadi, Didik; Hartanti, Lina P.; Mael, Masilva Raynox. 2022. The Ideological Resistance of Japan’s Kamikaze Pilots in A Book Entitled Kike Wadatsumi no Koe. Dalam Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. Pp. 224-232. Dapat diakses pada https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003265061. (Diakses pada tanggal 12 Mei 2022).
Sung-Jae Sim. Language and Symbolic Violence -Exploring Pierre Bourdieu’s Linguistic Theory- https://www.academia.edu/37191647/Language_and_Symbolic_Violence_Exploring_Pierre_Bourdieus_Linguistic_Theory (Diunduh, 5 Maret 2022).
Wahyudin, Ahmad. 2015. Kekerasan Simbolik pada Rubrik Mode dan Cantik Majalah Femina. “diksi. Jurnal Ilmiah Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya”. Vol. 23, No. 1, Maret 2015. Pp. 11-21.
Xíng, Fúyì (邢福义) dan Wú, Zhènguó (吴振国). 2010. (语言学概论（第 二版）). Wǔhàn: Huázhōng shīfàn dàxué chūbǎnshè.
Yule, George. 2014. Pragmatik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.