Keywords
online peer feedback
How to Cite
Abstract
As a supplementary of teacher’s feedback, peer feedback activity is believed can help the students improve their writing achievement. During and after the pandemic, teachers often applied online teaching for certain reasons, including in practicing peer feedback which can be done via different application. This study aims at investigating the types of comments appeared when the students conduct peer feedback in quip application. The study involved a class in which the teacher applied peer feedback via quip. This research is a descriptive quantitative in which the data was collected through documentation. The students’ responses were analyzed using types of comments proposed by Jun Liu and Hansen. The result of the study showed that the students made a lot of comments during online peer feedback activity. This study demonstrates that students are very active in giving comments during online peer feedback; however, it also underlines that the students still produced many local and non-revision comments.
References
Ary, D. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education Eight Edition. United State: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Alsubaie, Jawaher, Ashuraidah Ali (2017). Exploring Writing Individually and Collaboratively Using Google Docs in EFL Context. English language Teaching. Vol 10. No 10.
Ebadi, S and Rahumi, M. (2017). Exploring the Impact of Online Peer-Editing Using Google Docs on EFL Learners’ Academic Writing Skills: a Mixed Methods Study. Computer Assisted Language Learning. 787-815 (30) 8.
Huisman, Bart. Et al (2018). Peer Feedback on Academic Writing: Undergraduate Students’ Peer Feedback Role, Peer Feedback Perceptions and Essay Performance. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1424318
J. Harmer, H Purchase A, Luxthon-Reile. et al. 2015. A Comparison of Peer and Tutor Feedback. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. 40(1) 151-164. DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2014.893418
Jongsma, Mirella V.Scholten, et al. Feedback in Higher Education: Online Versus Offline Peer, A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research. ISSN. 0735-6331. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331221114181
Liu, Jun and Hansen G Jette. P (2005). Peer Response in Second Language Writing Classrooms. The University of Michigan Press.
Lundstorm, Kristy and Baker, Wendy. 2009. To Give is Better Than to Receive: the Benefit of Peer Review to the Reviewers’ own Writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 18 (2009) 30-42.
Putra, Gede Krisna Meialldy, Santosa, Made Hery, Pratiwi, Ni Putu Astiti,(2021). Students’ Perceptions on Online Peer Feedback Practice In EFL Writing. International Journal of English Education. Vol. 8. No. 2. DOI: 10.15408/ijee.v8i2.21488. P. ISSN-2356-1777
Rollinson, P.2005. Using Peer Feedback in ESL Writing Class. ELT Journal. 59 (1),23-30
Rouhi, A.and Azizian, E.(2013). Peer Review in Giving Corrective Feedback is Better than Receiving Receiving It in L2 Writing? Procedia- Social and Behavioural Sciences, 93, 1349-1354.
Suwantarathip, Ornprapat, (2014). The Effects of Collaborative Writing Activity Using Google Docs on Students' Writing Abilities. Turkish Online Journal of Education Technology. 148-156 (13) 2.
Widiati, U. 2003. Trained Peer Response to Develop EFL Students’ Positive Attitude Toward Peer Response.TEFLIN Jornal, 14(1).
Vu Phi Ho, Pam, et all (2020). Exploring the Value of Peer Feedback in Online Learning for the Provider. International Journal of instruction. Vol 13. No 1.
Seyyedrezaie, Zari Sadat Ghonsooly, et al (2016). A mixed methods analysis of the effect of google docs environment on efl learners' writing performance and causal attributions for success and failure. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education. Vol 13. (3) 90-110.
Putra, Gede Krisna Meialldy, Santosa, Made Hery, Pratiwi, Ni Putu Astiti,(2021). Students’ Perceptions on Online Peer Feedback Practice In EFL Writing. International Journal of English Education. Vol. 8. No. 2. DOI: 10.15408/ijee.v8i2.21488
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.