STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT IN THE SUSTAINABILITY REPORT OF PT SEMEN INDONESIA TBK

Authors

  • Alfian Dwi Pangestu Universitas Fajar
  • Habib Muhammad Shahib Universitas Fajar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21274/balance.v6i2.12002

Keywords:

Stakeholder Engagement, ESG, Sustainability Reporting, PT Semen Indonesia, GRI

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the form and level of stakeholder engagement in the sustainability report of PT Semen Indonesia (Persero) Tbk. The analysis was conducted on the 2024 ESG report of PT Semen Indonesia and its three subsidiaries. The method used is descriptive qualitative using GRI indicators 102-40 to GRI 102-44, as well as classification of engagement levels according to the Morsing & Schultz (2006) and Stocker et al. (2020) models. The results of the study show that the most dominant stakeholder engagement strategy is Level 1 (information strategy) through one-way communication using various media publications, while Level 3 participatory actions are still very limited. These findings confirm that stakeholder engagement is still informative in nature and has not yet reached the level of active collaborative dialogue. This study implies that improving two-way communication strategies is necessary to strengthen the company's legitimacy, accountability, and long-term sustainability.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Alfian Dwi Pangestu, Universitas Fajar

Fakultas Ekonomi dan Ilmu-ilmu Sosial, Universitas Fajar

Habib Muhammad Shahib, Universitas Fajar

Fakultas Ekonomi dan Ilmu-ilmu Sosial, Universitas Fajar

References

Bonetti, R., Cho, C. H., & Michelon, G. (2023). Stakeholder engagement and sustainability performance: Evidence from sustainability reporting practices. Journal of Business Ethics, 189(2), 411–429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05145-3

Freeman, R. E. (2018). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge University Press.

Galeotti, M., De Silva, T., & Pariera, N. (2023). Corporate legitimacy and stakeholder engagement towards sustainable business. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 14(3), 520–540.

Global Reporting Initiative. (2021). GRI Standards 2021: Universal standards – Sustainability reporting guidelines. GRI Publications.

Heryani, N., Fitriana, D., & Zulfikar, M. (2023). Dampak industri semen terhadap lingkungan dan masyarakat. Jurnal Lingkungan dan Pembangunan, 5(1), 44–55.

Maduta, S. R. W., Junjunan, M. I., & Nilamsari, S. E. (2025). The Effect of Green Accounting Implementation on Profitability in Non-Cyclical Consumer Companies. Balance: Journal of Islamic Accounting

Morsing, M., & Schultz, M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility communication: Stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(4), 323–338.

Pasko, K., Smolinski, K., & Wolska, G. (2021). Stakeholder dialogue in corporate social responsibility reporting. Sustainability, 13(7), 1–18.

Saadah, N., & Suciati, E. (2024). Green Accounting Study in Retail Companies: A Review of Environmental Ethics in Symbolic Disclosure. Balance: Journal of Islamic Accounting.

Stocker, F., de Arruda, M. P., & Mascena, K. (2020). Stakeholder engagement in sustainability reporting: A matrix for analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 242, 118–154.

Widyakusuma, R., & Faisal, F. (2022). Pelibatan pemangku kepentingan dalam laporan keberlanjutan sektor pertambangan di Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Auditing Indonesia, 26(1), 11–23.

PT Semen Indonesia (Persero) Tbk. (2024). Sustainability Report 2024. PT Semen Indonesia.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-31

How to Cite

Alfian Dwi Pangestu, & Habib Muhammad Shahib. (2025). STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT IN THE SUSTAINABILITY REPORT OF PT SEMEN INDONESIA TBK. BALANCE: JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC ACCOUNTING, 6(2), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.21274/balance.v6i2.12002