Keywords
How to Cite
Abstract
Shareholders really think about the strategy that should be used to start investing their shares in a company. One of them is by tending to invest in companies that have high concern for the environment and good social insight towards society. This study aims to empirically examine the effect of institutional ownership, managerial ownership and public ownership on environmental performance. The moderating variable used is profitability. Environmental performance proxies use PROPER (company assessment in managing the environment). The sample used is a company listed on the Jakarta Islamic Index for 2018-2022. Sampling using purposive sampling technique. The number of samples in this study were 9 companies with a total of 45 observations. Test the hypothesis using multiple linear regression analysis. The results of the research show that institutional ownership has a negative effect on environmental performance. Meanwhile, managerial ownership and public ownership have no effect on environmental performance. Profitability is able to moderate the effect of managerial ownership and public ownership on environmental performance.
References
Adiwuri, Diva and Nurleli, ‘Pengaruh Pengungkapan Akuntansi Lingkungan Dan Mekanisme Good Corporate Governance Terhadap Kinerja Lingkungan’, Jurnal Riset Akuntansi, 2022, pp. 8–15, doi:10.29313/jra.v2i1.670
Chen, Yi-Chun, Mingyi Hung, and Yongxiang Wang, ‘The Effect of Mandatory CSR Disclosure on Firm Profitability and Social Externalities: Evidence from China’, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 65.1 (2018), pp. 169–90, doi:10.1016/j.jacceco.2017.11.009
Corvino, Antonio, Federica Doni, and Silvio Bianchi Martini, ‘Corporate Governance, Integrated Reporting and Environmental Disclosure: Evidence from the South African Context’, Sustainability, 12.12 (2020), p. 4820, doi:10.3390/su12124820
Dal Maso, Lorenzo, Rodrigo Basco, Thomas Bassetti, and Nicola Lattanzi, ‘Family Ownership and Environmental Performance: The Mediation Effect of Human Resource Practices’, Business Strategy and the Environment, 29.3 (2020), pp. 1548–62, doi:10.1002/bse.2452
Deegan, Craig, ‘Introduction: The Legitimising Effect of Social and Environmental Disclosures – a Theoretical Foundation’, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15.3 (2002), pp. 282–311, doi:10.1108/09513570210435852
Dyck, Alexander, Karl V. Lins, Lukas Roth, and Hannes F. Wagner, ‘Do Institutional Investors Drive Corporate Social Responsibility? International Evidence’, Journal of Financial Economics, 131.3 (2019), pp. 693–714, doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.08.013
Ferrell, Allen, Hao Liang, and Luc Renneboog, ‘Socially Responsible Firms’, Journal of Financial Economics, 122.3 (2016), pp. 585–606, doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2015.12.003
Grewatsch, Sylvia, and Ingo Kleindienst, ‘When Does It Pay to Be Good? Moderators and Mediators in the Corporate Sustainability–Corporate Financial Performance Relationship: A Critical Review’, Journal of Business Ethics, 145.2 (2017), pp. 383–416, doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2852-5
Hahn, Rüdiger, and Regina Lülfs, ‘Legitimizing Negative Aspects in GRI-Oriented Sustainability Reporting: A Qualitative Analysis of Corporate Disclosure Strategies’, Journal of Business Ethics, 123.3 (2014), pp. 401–20, doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1801-4
Ifada, Luluk M., Khoirul Fuad, and Lisa Kartikasari, ‘Managerial Ownership and Firm Value: The Role of Corporate Social Responsibility’, Jurnal Akuntansi & Auditing Indonesia, 25.2 (2021), pp. 161–69, doi:10.20885/jaai.vol25.iss2.art6
Juhmani, Omar Issa, ‘Ownership Structure and Corporate Voluntary Disclosure: Evidence from Bahrain’, International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting, 3.2 (2013), p. 133, doi:10.5296/ijafr.v3i2.4088
Kim, Kwang-Ho, MinChung Kim, and Cuili Qian, ‘Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility on Corporate Financial Performance: A Competitive-Action Perspective’, Journal of Management, 44.3 (2018), pp. 1097–1118, doi:10.1177/0149206315602530
Kordsachia, Othar, Maximilian Focke, and Patrick Velte, ‘Do Sustainable Institutional Investors Contribute to Firms’ Environmental Performance? Empirical Evidence from Europe’, Review of Managerial Science, 16.5 (2022), pp. 1409–36, doi:10.1007/s11846-021-00484-7
Li, Wenjing, and Xiaoyan Lu, ‘Institutional Interest, Ownership Type, and Environmental Capital Expenditures: Evidence from the Most Polluting Chinese Listed Firms’, Journal of Business Ethics, 138.3 (2016), pp. 459–76, doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2616-2
Li, Wenjing, and Ran Zhang, ‘Corporate Social Responsibility, Ownership Structure, and Political Interference: Evidence from China’, Journal of Business Ethics, 96.4 (2010), pp. 631–45, doi:10.1007/s10551-010-0488-z
Liang, Hao, and Luc Renneboog, ‘On the Foundations of Corporate Social Responsibility’, The Journal of Finance, 72.2 (2017), pp. 853–910, doi:10.1111/jofi.12487
Lin, Ching-Chung, and Tran Phuoc Nguyen, ‘The Impact of Ownership Structure on Corporate Social Responsibility Performance in Vietnam’, Sustainability, 14.19 (2022), p. 12445, doi:10.3390/su141912445
Mahoney, Lois S., Linda Thorne, Lianna Cecil, and William LaGore, ‘A Research Note on Standalone Corporate Social Responsibility Reports: Signaling or Greenwashing?’, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 24.4–5 (2013), pp. 350–59, doi:10.1016/j.cpa.2012.09.008
Maulana, Agus, Eva Theresna Ruchjana, and Dian Hakip Nurdiansyah, ‘Pengaruh Ukuran Perusahaan, Profitabilitas, Leverage, Dan Kinerja Lingkungan Terhadap Environmental Disclosure’, Journal of Economic, Bussines and Accounting (COSTING), 4.2 (2021), pp. 787–800, doi:10.31539/costing.v4i2.1811
Oh, Won Yong, Young Kyun Chang, and Aleksey Martynov, ‘The Effect of Ownership Structure on Corporate Social Responsibility: Empirical Evidence from Korea’, Journal of Business Ethics, 104.2 (2011), pp. 283–97, doi:10.1007/s10551-011-0912-z
Suchman, Mark C., ‘Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches’, The Academy of Management Review, 20.3 (1995), p. 571, doi:10.2307/258788
Zhou, Taiyun, Mingxuan Liu, Xiyu Zhang, Zheng Qi, and Ni Qin, ‘Does Institutional Ownership Affect Corporate Social Responsibility? Evidence from China’, Economic Analysis and Policy, 81 (2024), pp. 84–98, doi:10.1016/j.eap.2023.11.017
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.