DESIGNING READING-WRITING TEACHING STRATEGY FOR THE ACADEMIC WRITING COURSE
PDF

Keywords

Reading, writing, academic writing, teaching strategy

How to Cite

Rochma, A. (2023). DESIGNING READING-WRITING TEACHING STRATEGY FOR THE ACADEMIC WRITING COURSE. Jurnal Bahasa Lingua Scientia, 15(1), 107-138. https://doi.org/10.21274/ls.2023.15.1.107-138

Abstract

The concept of integrating reading and writing in the language instruction has been portrayed through an increasing number of research studies. Nevertheless, many areas remain to be explored.  Even though previous research studies often portrayed the beneficial impacts of integrating reading and writing, yet they do not suggest how such impacts affect the students in a specific course. Hence, the present research study aims to propose a design of reading-writing teaching strategy that needs to be addressed within a specific course especially the academic writing course. This research study employed the adapted model of ADDIE (Dick et al., 2015) to develop the proposed teaching strategy. The process of need analysis was carried out through analysing the introduction section of research articles written by the undergraduate students using Swales and Feak’s CARS model (2004) and examining the syllabus of reading and writing courses. Meanwhile, as the primary frameworks for the teaching strategy development, the rhetorical reading strategies and academic writing were adopted. The results of need analysis show that, mostly, undergraduate students’ research articles lack 1 step in Move 1, 2 steps in Move 2, and 3 steps in Move 3 particularly in the introduction section. The omission of steps in the CARS model by these student-authors seems to happen due to two major factors, namely the scarcity of (1) control over the writing process and (2) linguistic resources. Hence, suggesting the reading-writing teaching strategy for academic writing courses is considered essential.

https://doi.org/10.21274/ls.2023.15.1.107-138
PDF

References

Adler-Kassner, L., Estrem, H. (2005). Reading practices in the writing classroom. Writing Program Administration, 31(1-2), 35-47.
Bean, J., Chappell, V., Gillam, A. (2014). Reading rhetorically (4th ed). Boston: Pearson.
Brown, H. Douglas. 2007. Principles of language learning and teaching. USA: Longman
Belmont, W., Sharkey, M. (2011). The Easy Writer Formal Writing for Academic Purposes. New York: Pearson Education.
Calhoun, J. (1971). The effect of analysis of essays in college composition classes on reading and writing skills. Doctoral dissertation, Boston University, In Dissertation Abstracts International, 32.
Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. (2005). The systematic design of instruction (6 ed.). Boston: Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.
Donelson, K. (1967). Variables distinguishing between effective in ineffective writers at the tenth grade. Journal of Experimental Education, 35, 37-41.
Duke, N., & Pressley, M. (2002). Effective practices for developing reading comprehension.
In A. J. Farstrup & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading
instruction (pp. 205-242). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Feldman, A. (1996). Writing and learning in the disciplines. New York: Harper.
Feiland, N. (1980). A national study of the level of composition achievement (superior/average) of twelfth grade composition students and selected personal characteristics/environmental factors. Doctoral dissertation, Northern Illinois University, In Dissertation Abstracts International, 41.
Fishco, D. (1966). A study of the relationship between creativity in writing and comprehension in reading of selected seventh grade students. Doctoral dissertation. In Dissertation Abstracts International, 27.
Graham, S., Liu, X., Bartlett, B., Ng, C., Harris, K., Aitken, A., Barkel, A., Kavanaugh, C., Talukdar, J. (2018). Reading for writing: A meta-analysis of the impact of reading interventioins on writing. Review of Educational Research, 88(2), 243-284.
Grobe, S., Grobe, H. Reading skills as a correlate of writing ability in college freshmen. Reading World, 16, 50-54.
Gustavii, B. (2008). How to Write and Illustrate Scientific Papers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hiebert, E. H., Pearson, P. D., & Taylor, B. M. (1998). Every child a reader: Applying
reading research in the classroom. Center for the Improvement of Early Reading
Achievement. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
Jordan, R. (1999). Academic Writing Course. England: Pearson Education Limited.
Kanoksilapatham, B. (2005). Rhetorical structure of biochemistry research articles. English for Specific Purposes, 24(3), 269-292.
Kanoksilapatham, B. (2011). Civil engineering research article introductions: Textual structure and linguistic characterization. The Asian ESP Journal, 7(2), 55-84.
Kaplan, R. (1966). Cultural thought patterns in intercultural education. Language Learning, 16 (1-2), 1-20.
Kuzborska, I. (2019). Rhetorical reading for writing strategies. Journal of ELT Research, 4(1), 1-7.
Macalister, J,. Nation, I. (2020). Language curriculum design. New York: Routledge.
McCrimmon, J. (1973). Writing with a purpose. New Jersey: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Meyers, A. (2014). Longman academic writing series. New York: Pearson Education.
Mirahayuni, N. (2001). Investigating generic structure of English research article writing strategy differences between English and Indonesian writers. TEFLIN Journal, 13 (1), 22-57.
Pho, P. (2008). Research article abstracts in applied linguistics and educational technology: a study of linguistic realizations of rhetorical structure and authorial stance. Discourse Studies, 10(2), 231–250.
Rahman, M., Darus, S., Amir, Z. (2017). Rhetorical structure of introduction in applied linguistics research articles. International Journal for Educational Studies, 9(2), 69-84.
Samraj, B. (2002). Introduction in research articles: variations across disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 21(1), 1-17.
Saz-Rubio, M. (2011). A pragmatic approach to the macro-structure and metadiscoursal features of research article introductions in the field of Agricultural Sciences. English for Specific Purposes, 30(4), 258-271.
Shanahan, T. (1988). The reading-writing relationship: Seven instructional principles. The Reading Teacher, 636-647.
Shanahan, T., Lomax, R. (1986). An analysis and comparison of theoretical models of the reading-writing relationship. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(2), 116-123.
Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shanahan, T., Ed. (1990). Reading and writing together: New perspectives for the classroom.
Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon.
Shanahan, T. (2006). Relations among oral language, reading, and writing development. In
MacArthur, C. A., Graham, S. & Fitzgerald, J. (Eds.). Handbook of writing research
(pp. 171-183). New York: Guilford.
Stotsky, S. (1983). Research on reading-writing relationships: A synthesis and suggested directions. Language Arts, 60(5), 627-642.
Swales, J.M & Feak, C.B. (1994). Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills. Michigan: The Michigan University Press.
Thomas, F. (1976). The extent of the relationship between reading achievement and writing achievement among college freshmen. Doctoral dissertation, University of South Carolina. In Dissertation Abstracts International, 37.
Woodfin, M. (1968). Correlations among certain factors and the written expression of third grade children. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 28, 1237.
Woodward, J., Phillips, A. (1967). Profile of the poor writer - the relationship of selected characteristics to poor writing in college. Research in the Teaching of English, 1, 41-53.
Yakhontova, T. (2003). English Academic Writing for Students and Researchers. Spain: PAIS.
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.