Abstract
This study aims to analyze the construction and critical reading of masculinity in the character of Dilan in Dilan 1990, a novel by Pidi Baiq, by highlighting the tension between romanticism and violence in gender relations. Employing a qualitative descriptive approach, the research applies close reading techniques to dialogues, narrative descriptions, and the character’s actions, grounded in R. W. Connell’s theory of hegemonic masculinity. The findings indicate that Dilan represents hegemonic masculinity through dominant attitudes, emotional control, and possessive behavior toward Milea, which implicitly positions women in a subordinate role within romantic relationships. However, a critical reading of the text also reveals internal contradictions in Dilan’s character, such as expressions of affection, care, and respect toward the maternal figure, reflecting an alternative form of masculinity. The tension between these representations suggests that masculinity in the novel is not singular but socially constructed and shaped by cultural norms and gender discourse of the 1990s. This study affirms that popular literature plays a strategic role in reproducing as well as problematizing gender values in society. Therefore, the findings have implications for teaching prose in senior high schools by promoting gender-critical literacy to foster students’ awareness of healthy and equitable romantic relationships.
References
Abidin, C. (2018). Internet Celebrity: Understanding Fame Online. Bingley: Emerald.
Anderson, E., & Taylor, S. (2019). Masculinities in Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.
Baiq, P. (2014). Dilan: Dia adalah Dilanku Tahun 1990. Bandung: Pastel Books.
Barry, P. (2009). Beginning Theory: An Introduction to Literary and Cultural Theory (3rd.) Manchester:; Manchester University Press.
Beynon, J. (2002). Masculinities and Culture. Philadelphia: Open University Pres.
Bourdieu, P. (2001). Masculine Domination. Redwood City, California; Stanford University Press.
Connell, R. W. (2005). Masculinities (2nd ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th. ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Damono, S. D. (2012). Sosiologi Sastra. Jakarta: Editum.
Engineer, A. A. (2018). The Rights of Women in Islam. New Delhi: Sterling Publishers.
Gill, R. (2016). Gender and the Media. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Johansson, T., & Ottemo, A. (2021). Young Men, Masculinities, and Love. London: Routledge.
Lazar, M. M. (2007). Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis: Articulating a Feminist Discourse Praxis. Critical Discourse Studies, 4(2), 141–164. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17405900701464816
Lazar, M. M. (2017). Feminist Critical Discourse Analysis. In The Routledge handbook of critical discourse studies (pp. 372–387). London: Routledge.
Moleong, L. J. (2018). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (Edisi Revi). Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Reeser, T. W. (2017). Masculinities in Theory. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Team, G. (2020). Global Education Monitoring Report 2020: Gender Report, A New Generation: 25 years of Efforts for Gender Equality in Education. UNESCO. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.54676/IBSP9880
Van Oosten, J. M. F. (2021). Adolescent girls’ use of Social Media for Challenging Sexualization. Gender, Technology and Development, 25(1), 22–42.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09718524.2021.1880039
Wharton, A. S. (2005). The Sociology of Gender: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Malden, MA; Wiley-Blackwell.
