IMPROVING STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ABILITY IN RECOUNT TEXT BY USING KWL (KNOW, WANT, AND LEARNED)
PDF

Keywords

improving
reading comprehension
recount text
KWL (Know
Want
and Learned)

How to Cite

Wahyuni, D. (2014). IMPROVING STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION ABILITY IN RECOUNT TEXT BY USING KWL (KNOW, WANT, AND LEARNED). Jurnal Bahasa Lingua Scientia, 6(1), 99-107. https://doi.org/10.21274/ls.2014.6.1.99-107

Abstract

This classroom action research was intended to know whether or not KWL (Know, Want, and Learned) technique can improve the ability of the students in comprehending reading in recount text. The researcher was helped by a collaborator and used observation checklist, interview, and questionnaire as the instruments of this research. Besides, she also used reading test to see the improvement of students’ reading comprehension ability in recount text on each cycle. The research started on February 22nd, 2014 and ended on March 8th, 2014. This action research was conducted to the students at SMPN 1 Durenan Trenggalek, class VIIIE. There were 34 students in the classroom. The researcher was conduct the research in two cycles and every cycle had three meeting. The researcher conducted the test three times. They were Pre Test conducted before the strategy was implemented. Post Test conducted at the end of cycle 1 and Post Test conducted at the end of cycle 2. The means score of the students’ reading comprehension test in the pre-test was 60. Then the students mean score of reading comprehension test in cycle 1 improved to 69 and in cycle 2 improved to 80. Based on the result of the study above, it could be inferred that the implementation of KWL (Know, Want, and Learned) was successful in this research, and the KWL (Know, Want, and Learned) technique could be an alternative to improve the students reading comprehension especially recount text.
https://doi.org/10.21274/ls.2014.6.1.99-107
PDF

References

Alderson, Charles. J. 2000. Assessing Reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Anchin, C.D. 1995. Learning Strategies Resources Guide. Florida: Region XIV Comprehensive Center.

Anderson, M and Anderson, K. 1998. Text Type: in English. Australia: Macmillan Education Australia PYT LTD.

Atmono, Dwi. 2009. Paduan Praktis Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Banjarbaru: PT.LKiS Pelangi Aksara.

Brown, H. Douglas. 2001. Teaching by Principles: an interactive approach to language pedagogy. San Fransisco: Longman.

Buehl, Dough. 2001. Classroom Strategies for Interactive Learning. Newark: International Reading Association, Inc.

Burns, Anne. 1999. Collaborative Action Research for English Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Burns, Anne. 2010. Doing Action Research in English Language Teaching. New York: Routledge.

Cahyono, B.Y. 2011. Teaching English by Using Various Text Types. Malang: State University of Malang Press.

Cahyono,B.Y. and Mukminatien, N. 2011. Techniques and Strategies to Enhance English Language Learning. Malang: State University of Malang Press.

Cahyono, B.Y. and Widiati, U. 2011. The Teaching of English as a Foreign Language in Indonesia. Malang: State University of Malang Press.

Collis, D., and Collins, A. 1998. Advancing Reading Achievement. USA: SERVE.

Department for Education and Skills. 2005. Understanding Reading Comprehension: 1. Norwich: HMSO, The Licensing Division, St Clements House.

Duke, N.K., and Pearson, P.D. 2004. Effective Practices for Developing Reading Comprehension. International Reading Association, Inc.

Fachrurrazy. 1994. Teaching English Language Skills and Components. Malang: IKIP Malang Press.

Grellet, F. 1981. Developing Reading Skill: a practical guide to reading comprehension exercise. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Harmer, J. 1998. How to Teach English. England: Longman.

Hewitt, R. and Little, M. 2005. Action Research in schools. Florida: Mason Avenue.

Hobri. 2007. Penelitian Tindakan Kelas: untuk guru dan praktisi. Jember: UPTD Balai Pengembangan Pendidikan Jember.

Khoriyah. 2010. Reading 1. Kediri: English Department Nusantara PGRI Kediri University Press.

Lado, Roberth, Ph.D. 1961. Language Testing. London: Lowe and Brydone.

Latief, M.A. (2011). Research Methods On Language Learning: An Introduction. Malang: State University of Malang Press.

McNiff, J and Whitehead, J. 2002. Action Research: Principles and Practice. London: RoutledgeFalmer.

Nilson, B, L. 2010. Teaching At Its Best. Sam Fransisco: A wile imprint.

Northern Ireland Curriculum. 2007. Active Learning and Teaching. Clarendon: CCEA

Nunan, D. 1991. Language Teaching Methodology: A textbook for teachers. United Kingdom: Prentice Hall International (UK) Ltd.

Nunan, D. 2003. Practical English Language Teaching. New York: McGraw-Hill/Comemporary.

Ogle, M.D. 1986. K-WL- : A Teaching Model that Develops Active Reading of Expository Text. International Reading Association.

Parel, Dr. M.F. and Jain. P.M. 2008. English Language Teaching. Jaipur: Sunrise Publishers & Distributors.

Pang, S, E. et. al. 2003. Teaching Reading. France: International Academy of Education.

Safrida, I, and Akhmadi,A. 2005. Smart Steps: The

Smartest Way to Learn English. Bandung: Ganeca Exact.

State Islamic College (STAIN) of Tulungagung. 2013. Thesis Writing Guideline. Tulungagung:t.p,.

Vacca, R.T. and Vacca, J.A. 1998. Content Area Reading: Literacy and Learning Across the Curriculum. United States: RR Donnely & Sons Company.

Before going to review process, all manuscripts will be checked that they are free from plagiarism practice using "Turnitin" software. If there is an indication of plagiarism, the manuscript will instantly be rejected.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.