Epistemologi Anarkhis Paul Feyerabend dan Implikasinya terhadap Pemikiran Islam
PDF

How to Cite

Faradi, A. (2014). Epistemologi Anarkhis Paul Feyerabend dan Implikasinya terhadap Pemikiran Islam. Ta’allum: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 2(2), 239-254. https://doi.org/10.21274/taalum.2014.2.2.239-254

Abstract

Nowadays, Islamic thought is trapped on the stagnancy of ideas. Such condition happens because the function of Islam changes, from an instrument for freedom to a rigid system of ideology. The similar pattern of change identified by Feyerabend also exists in the modern science. The similarity of the pattern inspired the writer to elaborate the concept of anarchy epistemology of Paul Feyerabend and its implication to the Islamic thought. This article uses philosophical hermeneutic  approach by Gadamer in investigating meaningful sense of Feyerabend thought. The conclusion of the study ends up with the importance of returning Islamic thought to the pluralistic environment  because Islam itself was not burn in a single thought but at least there are three epistemic patrons; Bayani, Burhani, and ‘Irfani.

https://doi.org/10.21274/taalum.2014.2.2.239-254
PDF

References

Al-Jabiri, Abid. Bunyah al-‘Aql al-‘Arabi. Beirut: Dar al-Tsaqi. 1993

Arkoun, Mohammed. Nalar Islami dan Nalar Modern. terj. Rahayu S. Hidayat. Jakarta: INIS. 1994

Bagus, Lorens. Kamus Filsafat. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama. 1996

Cayne, Bernard S. dkk. (eds.). Encyclopedia Americana. vol. I. Danbury: Grolier Incorporated. 1983

Feyerabend, Paul K. Against Method: Outline of an Anarchic Theory of Knowledge. London: New Left Book. 1975

--------, Science in a Free Society. New York: Schocken. 1978

Fuller, Steve. Kuhn vs, Popper, The Struggle for Soul of Science. London: Icon Books. 2003

Giddens, Anthony (ed.). Positivism and Sociology. London: Heinemann. 1975

Hardiman, Fransicus Budi. Kritik Ideologi, Menyikapi Pertautan Pengetahuan dan Kepentingan Bersama Jurgen habermas. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Kanisisus. 1991

Kuhn, Thomas. The Structure of Scientifc Revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 1962

Kuhn, Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 3rd edition, Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 1996

Magee, Bryan. Memoar seorang Filosof, Pengembaraan di Belantara Filsafat. terj. Eko Prasetyo. Bandung: Penerbit Mizan. 2005

Popper, Karl. Conjectures and Refutations. London: Routledge.1963

--------, The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London and New York: Routledge Classic. 2002

Preston, John (ed.). Knowledge, Science and Relativism: Philosophical Papers Volume 3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1999

Roswantoro, Alim dan Abdul Mustaqim (eds.). Antologi Isu-isu Global dalam Kajian Agama dan Filsafat. Yogyakarta: Idea Press. 2010

Runes, Dagobert D. (ed.). Dictionary of Philosophy. Totawa: Littlefield Adams & Co. 1971

Smith, Huston. Agama-agama Manusia. terj. Safroedin Bahar. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia. 1985

Soedarso, SP. Sejarah Perkembangan Seni Rupa Modern. Jakarta: CV. Studio Delapan Puluh Enterprise. 2000

Jurnal Penelitian Agama. No. 23. th. VIII. September-Desember 2009. Yogyakarta: Pusat Penelitian IAIN Sunan Kalijaga. 1999

Social Studies of Science. London: SAGE. vol 13. No. 3. 1983.

Perspectives on Science, (The Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Vol. 11. No. 2. 2003).

The author has full rights to the articles that has been sent to Ta’allum: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam. The author is responsible for the originality of the articles and all the references used in the journal script.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.