PERUBAHAN STATUS PERGURUAN TINGGI ISLAM (Studi Kasus IAIN Tulungagung)
PDF

How to Cite

Sulistyorini, S. (1). PERUBAHAN STATUS PERGURUAN TINGGI ISLAM (Studi Kasus IAIN Tulungagung). Dinamika Penelitian: Media Komunikasi Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan, 15(2), 133-150. https://doi.org/10.21274/dinamika.2015.15.2.133-150

Abstract

The abilities of an institution, including an university, to accept, respond and adapt to a change becomes an important aspect to be survive. By having those abilities, it can be seen that some university cannot only be survive but also greatly develop, forexample IAIN Tulungagung. However, some universities still cannot show their progress. In other words, the change of their status does not lead them to significantly develop. The study is intended to explore deeply about the organization status change of an Islamic university ( A Case Study at IAIN Tulungagung). The focus of the study refers to the following two aspects, they are (a) how is the process of organization change at IAIN Tulungagung?, and (b) how is the model of management employed at IAIN Tulungagung after its organization change?

Keywords: Organization Status Change, Islamic University, IAIN Tulungagung
https://doi.org/10.21274/dinamika.2015.15.2.133-150
PDF

References

Baldridge, J.V & Deal. T. & Ancell, 1975. Managing Change in Educational Organization. Berkeley: Mc Cutehan Publishing Corporation.

Beckhard, R., & Harris, R.T. 1877. Organizational Transition: Managing Complex Change. London: Addison Wesley Publishing Company.

Bennis, W. & Mische, M. 1996. Organisasi Abad 21: Reinventing Melalui Reenginneering. Terjemahan oleh Irma Andriani Rachmayanti. Jakarta: Ikrar Mandiri Abadi.

Bishop,C.H. 2001, Making Change Happen one person at a time: assessing change withinyour organization. New York: AMACOM.

Bogdan, R.C. & Biklen, S.K. 1990. Riset Kualitatif untuk Pendidikan. Terjemahan oleh Munandir. Jakarta: Depdikbud.

Fadjar, A.M. 1995. Pengembangan Pendidikan Islam yang Menjanjikan Masa Depan. Naskah Pidato Pengukuhan Guru Besar Fakultas Tarbiyah IAIN Sunan Ampel Malang. 29 Juli 1995.

Fremont E. Kast 7 J. E. Rosenzweig, 1985. Organization and management, Alih bahasa A. Hasyim Ali, (Jakarta: bumi Aksara, 1985.

Indrajit.E & Djokopranoto, R. 2006. Manajemen Perguruan Tinggi Modern. Jakarta: Andi.

Hatch. M,J. 1997. Organization Theory: Modern, Symbolic an Postmodern Perspectives. Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press.

Lincoln, Y.S., & Guba, E.G., 1985, Naturalistic Inquiry, New Delhi: Sage Publication, Inc. Maxwell, J.C. 1995, Developing The Leader Within You, Alih Bahasa Anton Adiwiyoto, Jakarta: Binarupa Aksara,

Miles, M.B & Huberman, A.M. 1992. Analisis Data Kualitatif. Terjemahan oleh Tjetjep Rohendi Rohidi. Jakarta: UI-Press.

Moleong, LJ. 1990. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, Bandung, PT. Remaja Rosdakarya Pankins, R.M. 1973. Struktural Factors in Academic Mobility, Journal of Higher Education. Vol. XLIV. Number 2. Februari. P. 95-102

Pedoman Pendididikan IAIN Tulungagung Tahun Akademik 2014/2015. 2014. Tulungagung: Penerbit STAIN Tulungagung.

Patahuddin, 2006. manajemen Sarana Prasarana Pendidikan Berbasis Sekolah dalam Sistem Persekolahan. Jakarta: Ditjen Mutendik Depdiknas. Ray, R.G. 1999, The fasilitative Leader: behaviors that Enable Success. New Jersey: Prentice hall, Inc.

Sallis, E. 1993. Total Quality Management in Education, (London: British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data,) Sanyal, B.C. 1995, Innovations in University management, Paris: UNESCO Publishing Stoltz, P.G. 2000 AdversityQuotient, Alih bahasa T. Hermaya. Jakarta: gramedia

Tadjudin, M.K. 2000. Higher Education Strategy Implementing the New Paradigm. Draft. Directorate general of Higher Education Ministry of Education an Culture.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.