Abstract
This research aimed to describe errors done by students in solving HOTS typed linear equation of two variables problem seen from the cognitive style in a Covid-19 pandemic era. This research uses a qualitative approach. Research subjects consist of 4 students selected among 31 students from class IX Junior High School 1 Petarukan, grouped into two students with cognitive style field-dependent (FD) and two students with cognitive style field-independent (FI). Subjects cognitive style was determined by Group Embedded Figures Test (GEFT) score, while errors in problem-solving were determined through TKPS and interviews. Field-dependent subjects tend to make errors in transformation and encoding with low or fair fallacy rate. On the other side, field-independent subjects tend to make errors in understanding the problems with low fallacy rate. The causes of errors made by field-dependent subjects are not being able to make complete mathematical models and not showing what they had searched. Meanwhile, field-independent subjects were incapable of making sketches perfectly. Other researchers' recommendation explains only errors in reading, transformation, processing capability, and encoding of students with cognitive style FD and FI. In this context, there are still a lot of other errors done by students. Therefore, the next researcher needs to conduct further research with better execution.
References
Abdullah, A. H., Abidin, N. L. Z., & Ali, M. (2015). Analysis of students’ errors in solving Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) problems for the topic of fraction. Asian Social Science, 11(21), 133–142. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v11n21p133
Agustina, L., & Khotimah, R. (2019). Kesalahan dalam menyelesaikan soal bentuk aljabar tipe Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS). Konferensi Nasional Penelitian Matematika dan Pembelajarannya (KNP MP) IV. https://publikasiilmiah.ums.ac.id/handle/11617/10903
Aji, R. H. S. (2020). Dampak Covid-19 pada pendidikan di Indonesia: Sekolah, keterampilan, dan proses pembelajaran. SALAM: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Syar-I, 7(5), 395–402. https://doi.org/10.15408/sjsbs.v7i5.15314
Ariyunita, N. (2012). Analisis kesalahan dalam penyelesaian soal operasi bilangan pecahan (Penelitian pada siswa kelas VII SMPN 2 Karanggede) [Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta]. http://eprints.ums.ac.id/21133/
Damayanti, D., & Khabibah, S. (2018). Profil berpikir kritis siswa dalam memecahkan soal Higher Order Thinking ditinjau dari gaya kognitif. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 7(3), 1–6. https://jurnalmahasiswa.unesa.ac.id/index.php/mathedunesa/article/view/25342
Dawadi, S., Giri, R., & Simkhada, P. (2020). Impact of COVID-19 on the education sector in Nepal - Challenges and coping strategies (pp. 1–16). https://doi.org/10.31124/advance.12344336
Dick, W., & Carey, L. (1996). The systematic design of instruction (4th ed.). Harper Collins. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-006-9606-0
Gikas, J., & Grant, M. M. (2013). Mobile computing devices in higher education: Student perspectives on learning with cellphones, smartphones & social media. Internet and Higher Education, 19, 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.06.002
Haloho, S. H. (2016). Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah ditinjau dari gaya kognitif siswa pada model pembelajaran missouri mathematics project [Universitas Negeri Semarang]. https://lib.unnes.ac.id/25289/1/4101412049.pdf
Hiltz, S. R., & Turoff, M. (2005). Education goes digital: The evolution of online learning and the revolution in higher education. Communications of the ACM, 48(10), 59–64. https://doi.org/10.1145/1089107.1089139
Khoiriyah, N. (2013). Analisis tingkat berpikir siswa berdasarkan teori van hiele pada materi dimensi tiga ditinjau dari gaya kognitif field dependent dan field independent [Universitas Sebelas Maret]. https://digilib.uns.ac.id/dokumen/download/29449/NjIwODY=/Analisis-Tingkat-Berpikir-Siswa-Berdasarkan-Teori-Van-Hiele-Pada-Materi-Dimensi-Tiga-Ditinjau-Dari-Gaya-Kognitif-Field-Dependent-Dan-Field-Independent-Penelitian-Dilakukan-Di-Sma-Negeri-1-Mojolaban
Kusumaningsih, W., Setiawan, P. ., & Utami, R. . (2020). Profil berpikir aljabar siswa SMP dalam pemecahan masalah. JIPMat, 5(1), 86–96. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26877/jipmat.v5i1.5574
Mahmudah, W. (2018). Analisis kesalahan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal matematika bertipe HOTS berdasar teori Newman. Jurnal UJMC, 4(1), 49–56. http://e-jurnal.unisda.ac.id/index.php/ujmc/article/view/845
Muslim, Ikhsan, M., Abidin, T. F. (2018). Student difficulties in solving High Order Thinking Skills ( HOTS ) problem on geometry problems viewed from the cognitive styles. Proceeding of The 8th Annual International Conference (AIC) on Social Sciences, 310–315. http://jurnal.unsyiah.ac.id/AICS-Social/article/view/12956/9951
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 results: Combined executive summaries. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), 1689–1699. www.oecd.org/about/publishing/corrigenda.htm
Purwanto, A., Pramono, R., Asbari, M., Santoso, P. B., Wijayanti, L. M., Choi, C. H., & Putri, R. S. (2020). Studi eksploratif dampak pandemi COVID-19 terhadap proses pembelajaran online di Sekolah Dasar. EduPsyCouns: Journal of Education, Psychology and Counseling, 2(1), 1–12. https://ummaspul.e-journal.id/Edupsycouns/article/view/397
Rahmania, L., & Rahmawati, A. (2016). Analisis kesalahan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita persamaan linier satu variabel. JMPM: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 1(2), 165. https://doi.org/10.26594/jmpm.v1i2.639
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sumarmo, U., Hendriana, H., & Ahmad, H. (2019). Tes dan skala matematika bernuansa High Order Thinking Skills. Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama.
Suryapuspitarini, B. K., Wardono, & Kartono. (2018). Analisis soal-soal matematika tipe Higher Order Thinking Skill ( HOTS ) pada kurikulum 2013 untuk mendukung kemampuan literasi siswa. Prisma, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 1, 876–884. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/prisma/article/view/20393
Tanujaya, B. (2016). Development of an instrument to measure Higher Order Thinking. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(21), 144–148. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318721755_Development_of_an_Instrument_to_Measure_Higher_Order_Thinking_Skills_in_Senior_High_School_Mathematics_Instruction
Usodo, B. (2011). Profil intuisi mahasiswa dalam memecahkan masalah matematika ditinjau dari gaya kognitif field dependent dan field independent. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 95–102. https://scholar.google.co.id/citations?user=tRzpS5AAAAAJ&hl=en
Wati, E. (2016). Kesalahan siswa SMP dalam menyelesaikan soal matematika berbasis PISA pada konten change and relationship. Konferensi Nasional Penelitian Matematika dan Pembelejarannya (KNP MP I), 199–209. http://eprints.ums.ac.id/40707/1/02. Naskah Publikasi.pdf
White, A. (2010). Numeracy, literacy and Newman’s error analysis. Journal of Science and Mathematica Education in Southeast Asia, 33(2), 129–148. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ970194
Witkin. (1973). The role of cognitive style in academic performance and in teacher-student relations. In Research Bulletin. New Jersey: Educational Testing Service.
Wojciechowski, A., & Palmer, L. (2005). Individual student characteristics: Can any be predictors of success? Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 8(2), 1–20. https://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/summer82/wojciechowski82.pdf
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.