Abstract
Problem-solving abilities have an important role in learning, especially in solving math problems, one of which is in circle material. This study aims to describe the mathematics problem solving process of junior high school students in solving circle problems through the process of solving problems in IDEAL. The approach used is a qualitative approach with a descriptive type. The sampling technique used in this research is purposive sampling technique. The results showed that, based on the problem-solving process, each subject had a different problem-solving process. S-1 with the category of completely solving problems fulfills the indicators in solving IDEAL problems. S-2 with the category of correct but not perfect does not yet fulfill the IDEAL problem-solving process. S-2 experienced errors when exploring the strategy and implementing the first problem strategy so that the final result was not in accordance with the objectives of the first problem. S-3 with the category of imperfect does not yet fulfill the IDEAL problem-solving process. S-3 only fulfills one IDEAL problem solving indicators, implementing strategies. However, the problem-solving process carried out by S-3 is not exactly in accordance with the objectives of the first and second problems.
References
Annizar, A. M., Masrurotullaily, Jakaria, M. H. D., Mukhlis, M., & Apriyono, F. (2020). Problem solving analysis of rational inequality based on IDEAL model. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1465(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1465/1/012033
Bransford, J. D., & Stein, B. S. (1984). GET THAT JOB Evidencing problem-solving skills. The Ideal Problem Solver.
Cintamulya, I. (2019). Analysis of students’ critical thinking skills with reflective and impulsive cognitive styles on conservation and environmental knowledge learning. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 20(1).
Das, R., & Das, G. C. (2013). Math anxiety: The poor problem solving factor in school mathematics. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 3(4), 1–5.
Erdogan, A., Baloglu, M., & Kesici, S. (2011). Gender differences in geometry and mathematics achievement and self-efficacy beliefs in geometry. Egitim Arastirmalari-Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 11(43), 91–106.
Fatahillah, A., Wati, Y. F., & Susanto. (2017). Analisis kesalahan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita matematika berdasarkan tahapan Newman beserta bentuk scaffolding yang diberikan. Kadikma, 8(1), 40–51.
Gravemeijer, K., Stephan, M., Julie, C., Lin, F. L., & Ohtani, M. (2017). What mathematics education may prepare students for the society of the future? International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15, 105–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9814-6
Gunawan, A. (2018). Analisis kesalahan dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita pada mata pelajaran matematika siswa kelas V SDN 59 Kota Bengkulu. Jurnal PGSD, 9(2), 216–225. https://doi.org/10.33369/pgsd.9.2.216-225
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (2002). The qualitative researchers companion: Reflections and advice. In The Qualitative Researchers Companion (pp. 393–398).
Nahdi, D. S., Jatisunda, M. G., Cahyaningsih, U., & Suciawati, V. (2020). Pre-service teacher’s ability in solving mathematics problem viewed from numeracy literacy skills. Elementary Education Online, 19(4), 1902–1910. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2020.762541
NCTM. (2014). Principles and standard for school mathematics. NCTM, 1–6.
Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1973). Human problem solving. Contemporary Sociology, 2(2), 169. https://doi.org/10.2307/2063712
Ni’mah, R., Sunismi, & Fathani, A. H. (2018). Kesalahan konstruksi konsep matematika dan scaffoldingnya. Edudikara: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 3(2), 162–171.
Novianti, D. E. (2020). Analisis kesalahan dalam mengerjakan soal materi logika matematika mahasiswa prodi pendidikan matematika IKIP PGRI Bojonegoro. JP2M (Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Matematika), 1(2), 24. https://doi.org/10.29100/jp2m.v1i2.191
OECD. (2015). COLOMBIA Key findings PISA results 2015. OECD. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/PISA-2015-Colombia.pdf
Permata, L. D., Kusmayadi, T. A., & Fitriana, L. (2018). Mathematical problem solving skills analysis about word problems of linear program using IDEAL problem solver. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1108(1), 0–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1108/1/012025
Polya, G. (1945). Polya’s problem solving techniques. In How To Solve It (pp. 1–4).
Polya, G. (2019). “How to solve it” list. In How to Solve It (pp. xvi–xviii). https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvc773pk.6
Rachmantika, A. R., & Wardono. (2019). Peran kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa pada pembelajaran matematika dengan pemecahan masalah. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 2, 439–443.
Rozencwajg, P. (2015). Cognitive processes in the reflective-impulsive cognitive style. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 166(4), 451–463. https://doi.org/10.3200/GNTP.166.4.451-466
Sahidin, L. (2016). Influence achievement motivation and knowledge base against the high school mathematics learning outcomes. International Journal of Education and Research, 4(6).
Su, X. (2020). Research on the innovation of college mathematics teaching based on computer aided technology under the thought of mathematical modeling. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1648(3). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1648/3/032090
Suherman, S. (2015). Kreativitas siswa dalam memecahkan masalah matematika materi pola bilangan dengan Pendekatan Matematika Realistik (PMR). Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(1), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v6i1.57
Szabo, Z. K., Körtesi, P., Guncaga, J., Szabo, D., & Neag, R. (2020). Examples of problem-solving strategies in mathematics education supporting the sustainability of 21st-century skills. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(23), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122310113
Wertheimer, M. (1959). Productive thinking. The Journal of Philosophy, 44(1), 22. https://doi.org/10.2307/2020404

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.