Keywords
visuospatial
Intelligence Quotient
Superior
How to Cite
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to describe the superior intelligence quotient (IQ) category students' visuospatial reasoning. This research was conducted at MAN 1 Trenggalek because the school had already conducted an IQ test. This research uses a qualitative approach with a descriptive exploratory type. The subjects in this study were students who had already done an IQ test with a superior IQ. This study will describe 2 subjects based on relatively the same tendency. Data collection techniques used documentary studies on IQ, test questions, think aloud, and semi-structured interviews. The data analysis in this study refers to Tversky B's research on visuospatial reasoning. The validity of the data in this study used technical triangulation. The results of this study indicate that students with superior IQ are able to meet the indicators of visuospatial reasoning, namely external representation, analysis, synthesis and conclusions as a whole. This is indicated by students with superior IQ who are able to complete the questions according to the procedure and completely.
References
Allen, K., Higgins, S., & Adams, J. (2019). The relationship between visuospatial working memory and mathematical performance in school-aged children: A systematic review. Educational Psychology Review, 31(3), 509–531. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09470-8
Bovaird, J. A., & Ivie, J. L. (2010). Intelligence/Intelligence Quotient (IQ). In C. S. Clauss-Ehlers (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Cross-Cultural School Psychology (pp. 545–547). Boston: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-71799-9_213
Creswell, J. W. (2015). Penelitian kualitatif dan desain riset (memilih di antara lima pendekatan). In Penelitian Kualitatif. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Davidson, L. S., Geers, A. E., Hale, S., Sommers, M. M., Brenner, C., & Spehar, B. (2019). Effects of early auditory deprivation on working memory and reasoning abilities in verbal and visuospatial domains for pediatric cochlear implant recipients. Ear and Hearing, 40(3), 517–528. https://doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000629
Lourenco, S. F., Cheung, C. N., & Aulet, L. S. (2018). Is visuospatial reasoning related to early mathematical development? A critical review. In Heterogeneity of Function in Numerical Cognition (pp. 177–210). Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-811529-9.00010-8
Lowrie, T., Logan, T., & Ramful, A. (2017). Visuospatial training improves elementary students’ mathematics performance. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(2), 170–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12142
Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif (edisi revisi). Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosda Karya.
Munroe, W. (2020). Reasoning, rationality, and representation. Synthese, 198, 8323–8345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02575-6
NCTM. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc.
Owens, K. (2014). Diversifying our perspectives on mathematics about space and geometry: An ecocultural approach. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(4), 941–974. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-013-9441-9
Owens, K. (2015). An ecocultural perspective on visuospatial reasoning in geometry and measurement education. In Visuospatial Reasoning (pp. 291–308). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02463-9_10
Owens, K. (2017). The role of culture and ecology in visuospatial reasoning: The power of ethnomathematics. In M. Rosa, L. Shirley, M. E. Gavarrete, & W. V. Alangui (Eds.), Ethnomathematics and its Diverse Approaches for Mathematics Education (pp. 209–233). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59220-6_9
Owens, K. (2020). Transforming the established perceptions of visuospatial reasoning: Integrating an ecocultural perspective. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 32(2), 257–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-020-00332-z
Pashler, H., & Tversky, B. (2013). Visuospatial reasoning. In Encyclopedia of the Mind (pp. 770–772). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452257044.n284
Petrosko, J. (1975). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children—Revised, 1974. David Wechsler. In Measurement and Evaluation in Guidance (pp. 265–267).
PISA. (2012). PISA 2012 Assessment and analytical framework: Mathematics, reading, science, problem solving and financial literacy. In OECD Report. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264190511-en
Reed, S. K. (2019). Modeling visuospatial reasoning. Spatial Cognition and Computation, 19(1), 1–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/13875868.2018.1460751
Reed, S. K. (2020). Visuospatial reasoning. In Cognitive Skills You Need for the 21st Century. Oxford Scholarship Online. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197529003.003.0008
Ricco, R. B., & Overton, W. F. (2012). Reasoning. In Encyclopedia of Human Behavior: Second Edition (pp. 257–264). Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-375000-6.00300-1
Saklofske, D. H., Schoenberg, M. R., Nordstokke, D., & Nelson, R. L. (2018). Intelligence quotient. In J. S. Kreutzer, J. DeLuca, & B. Caplan (Eds.), EnginEncyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychologyeer (pp. 1825–1829). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57111-9_1075
Susanti, E. (2015). Proses berpikir siswa dalam membangun koneksi ide-ide matematis pada pemecahan masalah matematika. Universitas Negeri Malang.
Tekin-Sitrava, R. (2020). Middle school mathematics teachers ’ reasoning about students ’ nonstandard strategies: Division of fractions. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 21(1), 77–93. Retrieved from https://www.cimt.org.uk/ijmtl/index.php/IJMTL/article/view/240
TIMSS. (2011). Trends In International Mathematics and Science Study 2011. Pirls. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.2017.62(1).03
Wechsler, D. (1981). The psychometric tradition: Developing the wechsler adult intelligence scale. Contemporary Educational Psychology, Vol. 6, pp. 82–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-476X(81)90035-7
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.