Abstract
The growing trade of second hand smartphones through digital platforms has inadvertently enabled the circulation of stolen goods, particularly from theft. Many buyers unknowingly purchase these items and risk prosecution under Article 480 of the Indonesian Criminal Code on fencing. This creates a legal imbalance, especially in proving the element of intent (mens rea) in buyers acting in good faith. This study examines the effectiveness of applying restorative justice to buyers of stolen phones who lack criminal intent, based on Indonesian Prosecutorial Regulation No. 15 of 2020. Using a normative legal approach, the research analyzes laws, legal theories, and restorative justice principles. Findings indicate that restorative justice can offer a more humane and fair alternative to conventional prosecution, provided certain conditions are met such as the absence of a criminal record, a peaceful agreement between parties, and restitution to the victim. However, its practical application remains limited due to structural challenges and a lack of awareness among law enforcement and the public. Therefore, a more inclusive legal policy is needed to extend restorative justice to third parties who are not directly involved in crimes but are legally affected under the current system.
References
Aziz, Muchlis, and Nurainiah. “Pengaruh Penggunaan Handphone Terhadap Interaksi Sosial Remaja Di Desa Dayah Meunara Kecamatan Kutamakmur Kabupaten Aceh Utara.” Jurnal Al-Ijtimaiyyah 4, no. 2 (2018).
Dignan, James. Understanding Victims and Restorative Justice. Inggris: Open University Press, 2005.
Hulsman, Louk H. C. “Critical Criminology And The Concept Of Crime.” Contemporary Crises 10, no. 4 (1986). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00728496.
Januri, Yuli Purwanti, Fathur Rachman, and Irwan Diwirya Jaya. “Aspek Yuridis Penerapan Tindak Pidana Penadahan Pasal 480 Ke-2 Kuhp Di Era Modern.” Audi Et AP : Jurnal Penelitian Hukum 3, no. 1 (2024). https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.24967/jaeap.v3i01.2860.
Kholil, M. “Tinjauan Empiris Pasal 480 KUHP Tentang Penadahan Menyangkut Hak- Hak Konsumen Dalam Pasal 4 Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen.” Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Bonum Commune 1, no. 1 (2018).
Kristanto, Andri. “Kajian Peraturan Jaksa Agung Nomor 15 Tahun 2020 Tentang Penghentian Penuntutan Berdasarkan Keadilan Restoratif.” Lex Renaissance 7, no. 1 (2022).
Mahmud Marzuki, Peter. Penelitian Hukum: Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Prenada Media, 2017.
Marlina. Peradilan Pidana Anak Di Indonesia: Pengembangan Konsep Diversi Dan Restorative Justice. Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2009.
Negara Republik Indonesia. UNDANG-UNDANG REPUBLIK INDONESIA NOMOR 1 TAHUN 2023 TENTANG KITAB UNDANG-UNDANG HUKUM PIDANA, TAMBAHAN LEMBARAN NEGARA REPUBLIK INDONESIA NOMOR 6842 (2023).
Negara Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 Tentang Hukum Acara Pidana, Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia
Nomor 76, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1981 Nomor 3209 (1981).
Republik Indonesia, Kejaksaan. Peraturan Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 15 Tahun 2020 tentang Penghentian Penuntutan Berdasarkan Keadilan Restoratif (2020).
Soekanto, Soerjono. Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2007.
Soekanto, Soerjono. Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2013.
Tutik, Tri Titik. Restorative Justice Dalam Perspektif Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia.
Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Group, 2022.
Zehr, Howard. The Little Book of Restorative Justice. Pennsylvania: Good Book, 2002.