STUDENTS’ PERSPECTIVE ON LECTURERS’ STRATEGIES IN TEACHING READING
PDF

Supplementary Files

Untitled

Keywords

students’ perspectives
lecturers’ strategies
teaching reading

How to Cite

Parwati, A., & Khoirot, U. (2018). STUDENTS’ PERSPECTIVE ON LECTURERS’ STRATEGIES IN TEACHING READING. Jurnal Bahasa Lingua Scientia, 10(2), 265-274. https://doi.org/10.21274/ls.2018.10.2.265-274

Abstract

Nowadays, especially in STKIP PGRI Tulungagung, the reading interest of the students is varied. But, they realize that reading is important. But, there were opinion from students that the lecturers’ strategies can affect their interest in reading or in reading lesson. The aim of this study is to know how students’ perspectives on lecturers’ strategies in teaching reading. For that reason, it does not analyze the way students learn during reading lessons. But, it just analyzed from the students’ opinion. The subjects of this study are students from semester two and students from semester four. There are two instruments employed: questionnaires (close and open questionnaires) and interviews. From the data obtained, the results of close and open questionnaires, most students from second semester and fourth semester have thought that in reading activity, it is not only focus on pronunciation. Then, they also thought that reading activity is very important to increase their knowledge even to add vocabulary. Furthermore, they agreed if reading is beneficial to add vocabulary and knowledge. Then, most of them said that the strategy used by lecturer in teaching reading is good and acceptable.
https://doi.org/10.21274/ls.2018.10.2.265-274
PDF

References

Brown, H. Douglas. 2007. Principles of Language Learning and Teaching 5th Edition. New York: Pearson Education

Brown, H. Douglas. 2001. Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy, Second Edition. New York: Pearson Education

Cohen, L., Manion L., 1994. Research Methods in Education. London: Routledge

Chettri, K., & Rout, S. K. (2013). Reading Habits - An Overview. IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science (IOSR-JHSS), 14(6), 13–17. https://doi.org/2279 - 0837

Cresswell, J., W. 2016. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches 3rd Edition. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar

Education, E., & Reutzel, R. (2006). Reciprocal Teaching.

Elizabeth, M.,E.,S. 2010. Method of Teaching English. New Delhi: Discovery Publising House

Fachrurrazy. 1993. Teaching English Language Skill and Component. Malang:Proyek OPF IKIP Malang

Farzaneh, N., & Nejadansari, D. (2014). Students’ Attitude towards Using Cooperative Learning for Teaching Reading Comprehension. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4(2), 287–292. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.4.2.287-292

Grabe W., Stoller., L. 2013. Teaching and Researching Reading Second Edition. Great Britain: Pearson Education Limited

Johnson Andrew P. (2008). Teaching Reading and Writing.

Nickols, F. (2016). Definitions & Meanings.

Zhang, L. (2013). Metacognitive Strategy Use and Academic Reading Achievement : Insights from a Chinese Context, 10(1), 54–69.

Zhussupova, R., & Kazbekova, M. (2016). Metacognitive Strategies as Points in Teaching Reading Comprehension. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 228, 593–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.07.091

Before going to review process, all manuscripts will be checked that they are free from plagiarism practice using "Turnitin" software. If there is an indication of plagiarism, the manuscript will instantly be rejected.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.