NEGOTIATING MEANING AND GRADES IN A SOCIOCULTURAL INVESTIGATION OF FORMATIVE CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT PRACTICES IN AN INDONESIAN ENGLISH LANGUAGE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT

Authors

  • I Putu Andre Suhardiana Universitas Hindu Negeri I Gusti Bagus Sugriwa Denpasar https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9186-9718
  • Ida Bagus Gde Phalaguna Universitas Hindu Negeri I Gusti Bagus Sugriwa Denpasar
  • I Gusti Ayu Indah Triana Juliari Universitas Dwijendra, Indonesia
  • Astuti Wijayanti Universitas Hindu Negeri I Gusti Bagus Sugriwa Denpasar
  • Ida Ayu Oka Purnami Universitas Hindu Negeri I Gusti Bagus Sugriwa Denpasar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21274/ls.2026.18.1.35-66

Keywords:

formative assessment, sociocultural theory, classroom discourse, assessment negotiation, Indonesian EFL, speaking assessment, learner identity

Abstract

Research on formative assessments in the classroom has primarily been based on lecturer’s assessment literacies in the form of questionnaires, and have ignored the elaborative, real time, assessment meaning negotiations that occur between lecturer and students. This qualitative case study examined the negotiations of the formative assessment criteria and feedback in the English as a Foreign Language speaking classroom in Indonesia. This study contributes to the social assessment dialogic process research. This study was part of a 16-week longitudinal qualitative research study conducted in the Universitas Hindu Negeri I Gusti Bagus Sugriwa Denpasar, and involved one lecturer and 25 students, while 7 focal students were chosen to participate in interviews. Data were obtained through Classroom Observational Research, video recorded interactions, Semi-Structured interviews, Stimulated Recall exercises, Reflective Journals, and Document analysis. Thematic analysis yielded four patterns of criteria negotiations; the (1) explicit/informal feedback rubric criterion conflict; (2) student-initiated clarification through questioning and requesting feedback exemplar; (3) lecturer-initiated clarifications as a response to feedback observed/perceived difficulties; and (4) the rare co-determination of rubric criteria through interactions, especially during collaborative rubric construction for the panel discussion tasks. The diverse assessment interactions also shaped the lecturer-student interactions relationships and changed students’ fear based learning identities to positive confident learning identities. The study concludes that formative assessment is essentially interpretive and relational, and that it necessitates pedagogical intentionality to guarantee that all learners have equitable engagement.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al Awlaqi, H. A. S. M., & Ghozali, I. (2023). Is oral communication apprehension reasonable?: A study on sociocultural factors among Indonesian efl learners. REiLA: Journal of Research and Innovation in Language, 5(3), 252-265.

Ansas, V. N., & Sukyadi, D. (2019). Source-based writing among undergraduate students: perspective and challenges. International Journal of Education, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.17509/ije.v11i2.14757

Astrid, A., Marzulina, L., Erlina, D., Harto, K., Habibi, A., & Mukminin, A. (2019). Teaching writing to efl student teachers: Teachers’ intervention and no teachers’ intervention through peer feedback writing techniques. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(9). https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.070908

Azis, A. (2014). Indonesian junior secondary school teachers’ conceptions of assessment: A mixed methods study. Faculty of Education, Doctoral D(February).

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the Black Box Raising Standards Through Classroom Assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2).

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5

Block, D. (2009). Second Language Identities. In Second Language Identities. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2011.576837

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative research journal, 9(2), 27-40.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage publications.

Brinkmann, S., & Kvale, S. (2018). Doing interviews. (2nd ed.). Sage publications.

Carless, D. (2012). From Testing to Productive Student Learning: Implementing Formative Assessment in Confucian-Heritage Settings. In From Testing to Productive Student Learning: Implementing Formative Assessment in Confucian-Heritage Settings. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203128213

Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8). https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.

Davison, C. (2019). Using Assessment to Enhance Learning in English Language Education. In Springer International Handbooks of Education: Vol. Part F1628. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02899-2_21

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2011). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. sage.

Flick, U. (2022). An introduction to qualitative research (7th ed.). Sage publication.

Friyandini, R. (2025). Authentic Assessment in Indonesian Language Learning: Theoretical Review And Its Implications. International Seminar on Humanity, Education, and Language, 1.

Fulcher, G. (2012). Assessment literacy for the language classroom. Language Assessment Quarterly, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2011.642041

Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2016). Stimulated recall methodology in applied linguistics and L2 research. Routledge.

Ghozali, A. S., Marshalina, A., Hanafi, M., & Aylet, Y. T. (2024). Speech Act Analysis of Teacher Talk in Indonesian EFL Classroom: A Case Study at Secondary School. Jurnal Pendidikan Humaniora, 12(4), 1.

Goffman, E. (2017). Interaction ritual: Essays in face-to-face behavior. In Interaction Ritual: Essays in Face-to-Face Behavior. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203788387

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research. Review of Educational Research, 77(1).

Istiarto Djiwandono, P., & Zein, S. (2025). School Language Assessment and Educational Policies. In The Routledge International Handbook of English Language Education in Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003399308-12

Izyani, M., & Mohamed Amin, E. (2016). Students’ perception on the use of WhatsApp as a learning tool in ESL classroom. Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 4.

Lamb, M. (2012). A Self System Perspective on Young Adolescents’ Motivation to Learn English in Urban and Rural Settings. Language Learning, 62(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00719.x

Lambert, C. (2010). A task-based needs analysis: Putting principles into practice. Language Teaching Research, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168809346520

Lee, I. (2017). Classroom writing assessment and feedback in L2 school contexts. In Classroom Writing Assessment and Feedback in L2 School Contexts. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3924-9

Lengkanawati, N. S. (2016). Teacher’s Beliefs about Learner Autonomy and Its Implementation in the Indonesian EFL Settings. In Language learner autonomy: Teachers’ beliefs and practices in Asian contexts.

Leung, C., & Lewkowicz, J. (2013). Language communication and communicative competence: A view from contemporary classrooms. Language and Education, 27(5). https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2012.707658

Lin, Y., & Curle, S. (2025). Understanding willingness to communicate in english medium instruction: Cultural and pedagogical influences on Chinese university students. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 34(5), 1593-1602.

Lyle, J. (2003). Stimulated recall: A report on its use in naturalistic research. British educational research journal, 29(6), 861-878.

Malone, M. E. (2013). The essentials of assessment literacy: Contrasts between testers and users. Language Testing, 30(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532213480129

May, L. (2009). Co-constructed interaction in a paired speaking test: The rater’s perspective. Language Testing, 26(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532209104668

Mcnamara, T. (2001). Language assessment as social practice: Challenges for research. Language Testing, 18(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/026553220101800402

Mirizon, S. (2021). Teachers of English Assessment Literacy: Unveiling What They Know and Do. Indonesian Research Journal in Education |IRJE|, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.22437/irje.v5i1.12834

Nakatsuhara, F., Inoue, C., & Khabbazbashi, N. (2020). Measuring L2 Speaking. In The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition and Language Testing. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351034784-31

Norton, B., & Kramsch, C. (2013). Identity and Language Learning: Extending the Conversation. In Identity and Language Learning: Extending the Conversation.

Nursehag, D. A., & Amalia, L. L. An Investigation of teacher talk and student talk in Indonesian EFL Classroom Interaction. PAEDAGOGIA, 27(2), 298-308.

Poehner, M. E. (2008). Dynamic assessment: A vygotskian approach to understanding and promoting l2 development. In Educational Linguistics (Vol. 9).

Poehner, M. E., & Lantolf, J. P. (2005). Dynamic assessment in the language classroom. Language Teaching Research, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168805lr166oa

Saputra, E. R., Hamied, F. A., & Suherdi, D. (2019). A Case of Authentic Assessment in Indonesian Secondary EFL Classroom Context: Teachers’ struggle. https://doi.org/10.2991/conaplin-18.2019.40

Sato, R. (2025). Japanese EFL Speakers’ Fluctuation of Willingness to Communicate: Its Interplay and Association with Feedback. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 48. https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2025.48.05

Scarino, A. (2013). Language assessment literacy as self-awareness: Understanding the role of interpretation in assessment and in teacher learning. Language Testing, 30(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532213480128

Seedhouse, P. (2010). The Interactional Architecture of the Language Classroom. Bellaterra Journal of Teaching & Learning Language & Literature, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/jtl3.32

Shohamy, E. (2014). The Power of tests: A critical perspective on the uses of language tests. In The Power of Tests: A Critical Perspective on the Uses of Language Tests. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315837970

Siregar, S. S., & Zulkifli, N. A. (2025). An Analysis Authentic Assessment On Speaking Abilities In English Classroom. Journal of Education and Teaching, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.24014/jete.v5i4.20003

Stake, R. E. (2013). Multiple case study analysis. Guilford press.

Sulistiyo, U., Haryanto, E., Widodo, H. P., & Elyas, T. (2020). The portrait of primary school English in Indonesia: policy recommendations. Education 3-13, 48(8). https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2019.1680721

Tisdell, E. J., Merriam, S. B., & Stuckey-Peyrot, H. L. (2025). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.

Turner, C. E., & Purpura, J. E. (2016). Learning-oriented assessment in second and foreign language classrooms. In Handbook of Second Language Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781614513827-018

Walsh, S. (2011). Exploring classroom discourse: Language in action. In Taylor and Francis Ltd 5 (Vol. 9780203827826). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203827826

Widodo, H. P. (2016). Language Policy in Practice: Reframing the English Language Curriculum in the Indonesian Secondary Education Sector. In Language Policy(Netherlands) (Vol. 11). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22464-0_6

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications (Vol. 6). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Zheng, Y., & Yu, S. (2018). Student engagement with teacher written corrective feedback in EFL writing: A case study of Chinese lower-proficiency students. Assessing Writing, 37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2018.03.001

Downloads

Published

2026-06-10

How to Cite

I Putu Andre Suhardiana, Ida Bagus Gde Phalaguna, I Gusti Ayu Indah Triana Juliari, Astuti Wijayanti, & Ida Ayu Oka Purnami. (2026). NEGOTIATING MEANING AND GRADES IN A SOCIOCULTURAL INVESTIGATION OF FORMATIVE CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT PRACTICES IN AN INDONESIAN ENGLISH LANGUAGE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT. Jurnal Bahasa Lingua Scientia, 18(1), 35–66. https://doi.org/10.21274/ls.2026.18.1.35-66