Digitalizing Community Empowerment: A Digital Ethnography of Interaction and Transaction Cost Efficiency in Village-Owned Enterprises

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21274/dinamika.2026.26.2.80-94

Keywords:

Community empowerment; digital ethnography; interaction architecture; transaction costs; Village-Owned Enterprises

Abstract

Digital technologies are increasingly embedded in rural development, yet platform adoption alone does not explain how digitalization changes the everyday practice of community empowerment. This study examines how digitally mediated interaction reorganizes coordination and transaction-cost efficiency in Village-Owned Enterprises (Badan Usaha Milik Desa, or BUM Desa) in a predominantly Muslim rural setting. A six-month digital ethnography was conducted in Kediri Regency, Indonesia, from September 2025 to February 2026. Data combined participant observation in a district WhatsApp group with more than 850 members, a seven-day intensive window containing 225 messages, observation of Zoom and digital-reporting practices, 13 semi-structured interviews lasting 60–90 minutes, and documentary records. Analysis identified a layered interaction architecture: hierarchical-formal interaction through Zoom, network-organic interaction through WhatsApp groups, and personal-relational interaction through private messaging. Zoom reduced travel and scheduling costs; WhatsApp lowered information-search costs and accelerated collective problem-solving; and private communication supported lower-cost clarification, monitoring, and conflict management. Internal income statements from one focal enterprise recorded a 41.77% revenue increase and a decline in the operating-cost ratio from 62.10% to 35.24% between 2023 and 2025. These figures are treated as contextual, noncausal evidence. Digitalization also shifted temporal and cognitive burdens onto facilitators through uneven connectivity, digital-literacy support, availability pressure, and fatigue. The study explains digital empowerment as a fit among interaction mode, institutional task, and relational sensitivity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Antlov, H., Wetterberg, A., & Dharmawan, L. (2016). Village governance, community life, and the 2014 Village Law in Indonesia. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 52(2), 161–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2015.1129047

Arifin, B., Wicaksono, E., Tenrini, R. H., Wardhana, I. W., Setiawan, H., Damayanty, S. A., Solikin, A., Suhendra, M., Saputra, A. H., Ariutama, G. A., Djunedi, P., Rahman, A. B., & Handoko, R. (2020). Village fund, village-owned-enterprises, and employment: Evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Rural Studies, 79, 382–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.08.052

Belkin, L. Y., Becker, W. J., & Conroy, S. A. (2020). The invisible leash: The impact of organizational expectations for email monitoring after-hours on employee resources, well-being, and turnover intentions. Group & Organization Management, 45(5), 709–740. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601120933143

BPS-Statistics of Kediri Regency. (2025). Kediri Regency in figures 2025 (Vol. 23). BPS-Statistics of Kediri Regency.

Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. Economica, 4(16), 386–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468–0335.1937.tb00002.x

Fahmi, F. Z., & Mendrofa, M. J. S. (2024). Digitalisation and rural livelihood transformation: Evidence from Indonesia. International Journal of Rural Management, 20(3), 313–334. https://doi.org/10.1177/09730052231223822

Fitriani, D., Md Shahbudin, A. S., & Shauki, E. R. (2024). Exploring BUMDES accountability: Balancing expectations and reality. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), Article 2402083. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2402083

Goldfarb, A., & Tucker, C. (2019). Digital economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 57(1), 3–43. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.20171452

Government of Indonesia. (2021). Government Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 11 of 2021 concerning Village-Owned Enterprises.

Harinurdin, E., Laksmono, B. S., Kusumastuti, R., & Safitri, K. A. (2025). Community empowerment utilizing open innovation as a sustainable Village-Owned Enterprise strategy in Indonesia: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 17(8), Article 3394. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17083394

Hilmawan, R., Aprianti, Y., Vo, D. T. H., Yudaruddin, R., Bintoro, R. F. A., Fitrianto, Y., & Wahyuningsih, N. (2023). Rural development from village funds, village-owned enterprises, and village original income. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 9(4), Article 100159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100159

Hine, C. (2015). Ethnography for the Internet: Embedded, embodied and everyday. Bloomsbury Academic.

Kania, I., Anggadwita, G., & Alamanda, D. T. (2021). A new approach to stimulate rural entrepreneurship through village-owned enterprises in Indonesia. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 15(3), 432–450. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEC-07–2020–0137

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). SAGE.

Monda, A., Feola, R., Parente, R., Vesci, M., & Botti, A. (2023). Rural development and digital technologies: A collaborative framework for policy-making. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 17(3), 328–343. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-12–2022–0162

Muhtar, E. A., Abdillah, A., Widianingsih, I., & Adikancana, Q. M. (2023). Smart villages, rural development and community vulnerability in Indonesia: A bibliometric analysis. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(1), Article 2219118. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2219118

Nugroho, C., Wulandari, A., Maulana, D., Rina, N., & Kalaloi, A. F. (2025). Digital communication and literacy for MSME empowerment: Evidence from a rural digital village in Indonesia. International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, 8(3), 4523–4535. https://doi.org/10.53894/ijirss.v8i3.7544

Pink, S., Horst, H., Postill, J., Hjorth, L., Lewis, T., & Tacchi, J. (2016). Digital ethnography: Principles and practice. SAGE.

Postill, J., & Pink, S. (2012). Social media ethnography: The digital researcher in a messy web. Media International Australia, 145(1), 123–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/1329878X1214500114

Saldana, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (4th ed.). SAGE.

Salemink, K., Strijker, D., & Bosworth, G. (2017). Rural development in the digital age: A systematic literature review on unequal ICT availability, adoption, and use in rural areas. Journal of Rural Studies, 54, 360–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.09.001

Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford University Press.

Suhartanti, P. D., & Sholikhah, Z. (2026). Village-owned enterprises as engines of inclusive and sustainable local economy: Rethinking leadership, HR and digitalization. Social Responsibility Journal. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-08–2025–0834

Ultari, T., & Khoirunurrofik. (2024). The role of Village-Owned Enterprises (BUMDes) in village development: Empirical evidence from villages in Indonesia. Jurnal Perencanaan Pembangunan: The Indonesian Journal of Development Planning, 8(2), 256–280. https://doi.org/10.36574/jpp.v8i2.559

Van Gaeveren, K., Murphy, S. L., de Segovia Vicente, D., & Vanden Abeele, M. M. P. (2026). Connected yet cognitively drained? A mixed-methods study examining whether online vigilance and availability pressure promote mental fatigue. Communication Research, 53(5), 603–631. https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502241248494

van Dijk, J. (2020). The digital divide. Polity.

Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism: Firms, markets, relational contracting. Free Press.

Wulandari, F., & Wardani, M. K. (2024). Open innovation in village-owned enterprises: The role of entrepreneurial orientation in improving financial and social performance. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), Article 2350079. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2350079

World Bank. (2021). Beyond unicorns: Harnessing digital technologies for inclusion in Indonesia. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/36018

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2026-10-20

How to Cite

Supriyanto, S., & Hariadi, S. (2026). Digitalizing Community Empowerment: A Digital Ethnography of Interaction and Transaction Cost Efficiency in Village-Owned Enterprises. Dinamika Penelitian: Media Komunikasi Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan, 26(2), 80–94. https://doi.org/10.21274/dinamika.2026.26.2.80-94