Keywords
hybrid class
favorable teaching and learning
Google docs
assessment
How to Cite
Abstract
This preliminary study aims at describing how a hybrid class has been implemented in English class of non-English Department students. The questionnaire of the online survey was employed to collect the primary data. About 25 students from Management Study Program became the subjects of the study. This study found most students had positive perceptions towards the implementation of the hybrid model in terms of the curriculum, assessment, classroom management, materials, teaching and learning activities, and teacher’s feedback. Despite the fact that most students favor the prevailing hybrid class, this combined model of the conventional and online learning is also subject to some weaknesses: time-consuming for giving feedback, copyright issues, the cost of buying the devices and internet connection service.
References
Carson, L. (2007) Relatedness and learner autonomy: A case study of an adult refugee learning English in Ireland. Reflections on English Language Teaching, 6 (2), 21–38.
El-Hussein, M. O. M., & Cronje, J. C. (2010). Defining mobile learning in the higher education landscape. Educational Technology & Society, 13(3), 12-21.
Gui, H. (2016). Analysing and evaluating current mobile applications for learning English speaking. Birkbeck: University of London.
Jeng, Y.-L., Wu, T.-T., Huang, Y.-M., Tan, Q., & Yang, S. J. H. (2010). The add-on impact of mobile applications in learning strategies: A Review Study. Educational Technology & Society, 13 (3), 3–11.
Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Shield, L. (2008). An overview of mobile assisted language learning: From content delivery to supported collaboration and interaction. ReCALL, 20(3), 271-289.
Kukulska-Hulme, A., Norris, L & Donohue, J. (2015). Mobile pedagogy for English language teaching: a guide for teachers. ELT Research Papers. London: British Council. Retrieved 6/10/2016 from https://englishagenda.britishcouncil.org/sites/default/files/attachments/e485_mobile_pedagogy_for_elt_final_v2.pdf
Oz, H. (2015) An Investigation of pre-service English Teachers’ Perceptions of Mobile Assisted Language Learning. English Language Teaching. 8 (2), 22-34.
Sharples, M., Arnedillo-Sánchez, I., Milrad, M., & Vavoula, G. (2009). Mobile learning in Technology-enhanced learning (233-249). Springer Netherlands.
Peachey, N. (2010). Survey: Mobile learning for English language teachers. Retrieved 7/10/2016 from http://technogogy.org.uk/mobile_survey.pdf
Reinders, H & White, C. (2016). 20 Year of autonomy and technology.how far have we come and where to next? Langauge Learning & Technology 20 (2), 143-154.
Reinders, H. (2010). Twenty Ideas for Using Mobile Phones in the Language Classroom. In English Teaching Forum (Vol. 48, No. 3, p. 20). US Department of State. Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Office of English Language Programs, SA-5, 2200 C Street NW 4th Floor, Washington, DC 20037.
Ustunluoglu, E. (2009). Autonomy in language learning: do students take responsibility for their own learning? Igitimde Kuram ve Uygulama. Joutnal of Theory and Practice in Education, 5(2), 148-169.
Zao, Y. & Breslow, L. (2013). Literature Review on Hybrid/Blended Learning. Retrieved 5/10/2016 from https://tll.mit.edu/sites/default/files/library/Blended_Learning_Lit_Reveiw.pdf
Before going to review process, all manuscripts will be checked that they are free from plagiarism practice using "Turnitin" software. If there is an indication of plagiarism, the manuscript will instantly be rejected.