Keywords
interaction
face theory
strategy
How to Cite
Abstract
Politeness plays an important role in interaction in order to ovoid friction and conflict between speaker and hearer. This article aims to describe politeness by lecturer to students in academic interaction at IAIN Tulungagung. This study is qualitatively approached using pracmatics design. The data were collected using technique of observation by listening, writing notes, and participating. The data then, analyzed using interactive model adopted from Miles & Huberman. The data were classified according to face theory of Brawn & Levinson i.e. strategy of positive politeness and strategy of netagive politeness. Data analysis reveals that positive politeness strategies used by lecturer in academic interaction at IAIN Tulungagung are (1) the use of attention to speaker need, (2) the use group identity markers, (3) the use of agreement on the same topics, (4) the use of ovoiding disagreement by pseudo-agreement, (5) expressing understanding of speaker need, (6) the use of being optimistic, (7) involving the hearer in the speaker activities, (8) seeking for reasons or giving question, and (9) extending presents. While negative politeness strtaegies used by lecturer in academic interaction at IAIN Tulungagung are (1) the use of indirect utterances, (2) the use of being pessimistic, (3) minimize burden, (4) the use of respect, (5) asking for apologies, (6) the use of impersonal form, (7) the use of general rules of interaction.References
Beebe, L. M., & Takahashi, T. (1989). Sociolinguistic Variation in Face-Threatening Speech Acts. In The Dynamic Interlanguage. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0900-8_13
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1978). Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. Questions and Politeness:Strategies in Social Interaction., 56–311. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587263
Chen, G. M. (2015). Losing Face on Social Media: Threats to Positive Face Lead to an Indirect Effect on Retaliatory Aggression Through Negative Affect. Communication Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650213510937
CHENG, C. ‐Y. (1986). THE CONCEPT OF FACE AND ITS CONFUCIAN ROOTS. Journal of Chinese Philosophy. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6253.1986.tb00102.x
Davis, W. A. (2016). Implicature. In Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy and Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7546-5_2
Gunawan, F. (2013). Wujud Kesantunan Berbahasa Mahasiswa Terhadap Dosen Di STAIN Kendari: Kajian Sosiopragmatik. Journal Arbitrer, 1(1), 8–18.
Hall, C. (2010). Politeness in Europe. Journal of Pragmatics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.12.002
Kedveš, A. (2013). Face threatening acts and politeness strategies in summer school application calls. Jezikoslovlje.
Leech, G. (2014). The Pragmatics of Politeness. In The Pragmatics of Politeness. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195341386.001.0001
Miles & Huberman. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (3rd ed.). In Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.).
Obana, Y. (2011). Politeness in Japan. In Politeness in East Asia. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511977886.009
Okamoto, S. (2010). Politeness in east Asia. In Interpersonal Pragmatics. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110214338.1.71
Pan, Y. (2011). Politeness in China. In Politeness in East Asia. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511977886.008
Pramujiono, A. (2012). Dari Mianzi Dan Lian Menuju Face: Dari Kearifan Lokal Cina Menuju Teori Kesantunan Yang Mendunia. Lingua Cultura. https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v6i2.407
Qi, X. (2011). Face: A chinese concept in a global sociology. Journal of Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1177/1440783311407692
Rois, H. S. dan S. (2017). Pembentukan Karakter Melalui Kesantunan Berbahasa Guru di SD Immersion Ponorogo. Prosiding Seminar Nasional PPKn III. Retrieved from http://staff.uny.ac.id/sites/default/files/pengabdian/dr-sumaryanto-mkes/9-pembentukan-karakter-melalui-olahraga.pdf
Simpen, I. W., Mbete, A. M., Suastra, I. M., & Pastika, I. W. (2015). Kesantunan Berbahasa Pada Penutur Bahasa Kambera Di Sumba Timur. PhD Proposal, 1, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Sirimangkala, P. (2013). Book Review: Politeness in East Asia. Journal of Language and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927x13479784
Winarsih, S. (2017). PRINSIP KERJA SAMA DALAM PERCAKAPAN BERBAHASA INGGRIS DI RADIO. Paramasastra. https://doi.org/10.26740/parama.v1i1.1475
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.