Keywords
How to Cite
Abstract
In learning English, the learners make some common mistakes in applying the correct grammar. One of the mistakes is the error in explaining graphs in English. This competency is highly needed to be applied in many aspects, especially for vocational university students. For example, explaining a chart in English is somehow mandatory in composing a budget or presenting a project to a client. Thus, this study is aimed to identify the types of grammatical errors typically done by the learners. By applying the descriptive qualitative methodology, the 30 data used in this study are taken from the sample of students’ writing in explaining a chart in English. The steps taken are done by doing data categorization based on Dulay’s surface strategy taxonomy which mentions four types of errors: addition, omission, misformation, and misordering. The results show that omission is the type of error mostly done by learners with 34,78%, followed by addition with 31,88% occurrence, and the least error found in the data is misorder with 10,14%. It is suggested that students should be equipped with basic Grammar understanding in explaining a graph in English, so this kind of error will be minimized. This study is also expected to give insight to lecturers in composing the General English syllabus that emphasizes the student’s understanding of basic Grammar.
References
Ayuningtyas, D. I., & Wenanda, D. (2013). Analisis Kesalahan Aspek Grammatika Karangan Mahasiswa Semester 3 Program Studi Sastra Inggris Universitas Trunojoyo Madura. Pamator, 6(1), 17–30.
Dewi, N. L. D. S., Utami, G. W. N. U., & Wardhana, I. G. N. P. (2021). SURFACE STRATEGY TAXONOMY ANALYSIS IN STUDENTS’ PRESENTATION USING MIND MAPPING. Journal of English Educational Study (JEES), 4(2), 131–139.
Durbin, C. G. (2004). Effective Use of Tables and Figures in Abstracts, Presentations, and Papers. RESPIRATORY CARE , 49(10), 1233–1237.
Esmalde, V. S. (2020). Surface Strategy Taxonomy in Error Analysis: Basis for Grammatical Competence Enhancement Program (GCEP). International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 9(7), 785–792. https://doi.org/10.21275/SR20707113109
Hidayat, F., & Krismanti, N. (2022). STUDENTS’ SURFACE STRATEGY TAXONOMY ERRORS IN NARRATING A STORY: A MORPHO-SYNTACTICAL VIEW. Journal of English Educational Study (JEES), 5, 49–56.
Khansir, A. A. (2012). Error analysis and second language acquisition. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(5), 1027–1032. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.2.5.1027-1032
Monny, M. O. E., & Pratiwi, N. P. D. I. (2022). The Implementation of Surface Strategy Taxonomy Through Report Text Translation. Retorika: Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa, 8(1), 79–89. https://doi.org/10.55637/jr.8.1.4344.79-89
Powers, D. E. (2010). The Case for a Comprehensive, Four-Skills Assessment of English Language Proficiency.
Rusmiati. (2019). SURFACE STRATEGY TAXONOMY ON FOREIGN LANGUAGE WRITING: A STUDY ON VERB TENSE USAGE. Jurnal Serambi Ilmu, 20(2), 189–201.
Rustipa, K. (2011). Contrastive Analysis, Error Analysis, Interlanguage and the Implication to Language Teaching. Ragam Jurnal Pengembangan Humaniora , 11(1), 16–22. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_
Sari, Y. A., Septiyana, L., Suhono, S., Anggaira, A. S., & Hasyim, U. A. F. A. (2021). Corrective Feedback in Learning Interaction: Integration of Surface Strategy Taxonomy. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 13(3), 2266–2280. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v13i3.847
Sompong, M. (2013). Error Analysis. In Thammasat Review (Vol. 109, Issue 2).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.