DEBAT DAN ARGUMEN (HAKIKAT, RAGAM, DAN STRATEGI)

Authors

  • M. Jazeri STAIN Tulungagung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21274/ls.2010.2.1.47-66

Keywords:

debate, argument, reasoning, fallacy

Abstract

Debate is arguing for certain topic with different  opinion or claim between affirmative team and negative team.  Seing from its elements, argument can be analyzed through two models; traditional argument model and Toulmin argument model. Traditional model is classified into four lay outs, namely (1) simple layout, (2) complex layout, (3) chain layout, and (4) compound layout.  Toulmin model is classified into five layouts, namely  layout I, layout II, layout III, layout IV, and layout V. Seing from its fallacy, the fallacy of argument is categorized into linguistics fallacy and relevance fallacy. Linguistics fallacies are equivoc term, amfiboly term, composition fallacy, devision fallacy, and accent fallacy. While relevance fallacies are argumentum ad hominem, argumentum ad verecundian, argumentum ad baculum, argumentum ad populum, argumentum ad misericordian, post hoc propter hoc, petitio principi, argumentum ad ignorantiam, dan ignoratio elenchi.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Copi, Irving M. 1982. Introduction to Logic. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc.

Jeffrey, Richard. C. 1967. Formal Logic: Its Scope and Limits. New York: McGrow-Hill, Inc.

Kurger, Arthur, N. 1960. Modern Debate: Its Logic and Strategy. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.

Nimmo, Dan. 2006. Political Kommunication and Public Opinion and America. (ter. Tjun Suryatman). Bandung: Remaja Rosda Karya.

Oesterle, John, A. 1954. Logic; The Art of Defining and Reasoning. New York: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Sullivan, Daniel, J. 1963. Fundamentals of Logic. New York: McGrow-Hill, Inc.

Sumaryono, Eugenius. 1999. Dasar-Dasar Logika. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Toulmin, Stephen, E. 1990. The Use of Argument. Cambridge: University Press.

Vedung, Evert. 1982. Political Reasoning. London: Sage Publication.

Warnick, Barbara dan Inch, Edward S. 1994. Critical Thinking and Communication: The Use of Reason in Argument. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.

Wiyanto, Asul. Tt. Debat sebagai Retorika. Semarang: CV Aneka Ilmu.

Downloads

Published

2010-06-08

How to Cite

Jazeri, M. (2010). DEBAT DAN ARGUMEN (HAKIKAT, RAGAM, DAN STRATEGI). Jurnal Bahasa Lingua Scientia, 2(1), 47–66. https://doi.org/10.21274/ls.2010.2.1.47-66

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 1 (2010)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.

c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).