DEBAT DAN ARGUMEN (HAKIKAT, RAGAM, DAN STRATEGI)
PDF

Keywords

debate
argument
reasoning
fallacy

How to Cite

Jazeri, M. (2010). DEBAT DAN ARGUMEN (HAKIKAT, RAGAM, DAN STRATEGI). Jurnal Bahasa Lingua Scientia, 2(1), 47-66. https://doi.org/10.21274/ls.2010.2.1.47-66

Abstract

Debate is arguing for certain topic with different  opinion or claim between affirmative team and negative team.  Seing from its elements, argument can be analyzed through two models; traditional argument model and Toulmin argument model. Traditional model is classified into four lay outs, namely (1) simple layout, (2) complex layout, (3) chain layout, and (4) compound layout.  Toulmin model is classified into five layouts, namely  layout I, layout II, layout III, layout IV, and layout V. Seing from its fallacy, the fallacy of argument is categorized into linguistics fallacy and relevance fallacy. Linguistics fallacies are equivoc term, amfiboly term, composition fallacy, devision fallacy, and accent fallacy. While relevance fallacies are argumentum ad hominem, argumentum ad verecundian, argumentum ad baculum, argumentum ad populum, argumentum ad misericordian, post hoc propter hoc, petitio principi, argumentum ad ignorantiam, dan ignoratio elenchi.
https://doi.org/10.21274/ls.2010.2.1.47-66
PDF

References

Copi, Irving M. 1982. Introduction to Logic. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc.

Jeffrey, Richard. C. 1967. Formal Logic: Its Scope and Limits. New York: McGrow-Hill, Inc.

Kurger, Arthur, N. 1960. Modern Debate: Its Logic and Strategy. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.

Nimmo, Dan. 2006. Political Kommunication and Public Opinion and America. (ter. Tjun Suryatman). Bandung: Remaja Rosda Karya.

Oesterle, John, A. 1954. Logic; The Art of Defining and Reasoning. New York: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Sullivan, Daniel, J. 1963. Fundamentals of Logic. New York: McGrow-Hill, Inc.

Sumaryono, Eugenius. 1999. Dasar-Dasar Logika. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Toulmin, Stephen, E. 1990. The Use of Argument. Cambridge: University Press.

Vedung, Evert. 1982. Political Reasoning. London: Sage Publication.

Warnick, Barbara dan Inch, Edward S. 1994. Critical Thinking and Communication: The Use of Reason in Argument. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.

Wiyanto, Asul. Tt. Debat sebagai Retorika. Semarang: CV Aneka Ilmu.

Before going to review process, all manuscripts will be checked that they are free from plagiarism practice using "Turnitin" software. If there is an indication of plagiarism, the manuscript will instantly be rejected.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.